Effectiveness Evaluation of Different IDSs Using Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model

Cyber-attacks are becoming progressively complicated; hence, the functional issues of intrusion-detection systems (IDSs) present ever-growing challenges. Failing to detect intrusions may jeopardize the trustworthiness of security services, such as privacy preservation, authenticity, and accessibility. To fight these risks, different organizations nowadays use a variety of approaches, techniques, and technologies to safeguard the systems' credibility. Establishing policies and procedures, raising user awareness, implementing firewall and verification systems, controlling system access, and building computer-issue management groups are all examples of safeguarding methods. There is a lack of sufficient emphasis on the effectiveness of intrusion-detection systems. In enterprises, IDS is used to analyze the potentially dangerous activities taking place within the technological settings. The selection of efficient IDS is a challenging task for organizations. This research evaluates the impact of five popular IDSs for their efficiency and effectiveness in information security. The authors used the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)-based integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to evaluate the efficacy of the popular IDSs. The findings of this research suggest that most of the IDSs appear to be highly potential tools. Even though Snort is extensively deployed, Suricata has a substantial advantage over Snort. Suricata uses multi-threading functionality in comparison to Snort to boost the processing performance.