Knowledge, expectations, and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies

被引:20
作者
Coley, JD
Hayes, B
Lawson, C
Moloney, M
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
knowledge; expectations; inductive reasoning; conceptual hierarchies; living kinds; artifacts;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00159-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research (e.g. Cognition 64 (1997) 73) suggests that the privileged level for inductive inference in a folk biological conceptual hierarchy does not correspond to the "basic" level (i.e. the level at which concepts are both informative and distinct). To further explore inductive inference within conceptual hierarchies, we examine relations between knowledge of concepts at different hierarchical levels, expectations about conceptual coherence, and inductive inference. In Experiments I and 2, 5-and 8-year-olds and adults listed features of living kind (Experiments I and 2) and artifact (Experiment 2) concepts at different hierarchical levels (e.g. plant, tree, oak, desert oak), and also rated the strength of generalizations to the same concepts. For living kinds, the level that showed a relative advantage on these two tasks differed; the greatest increase in features listed tended to occur at the life-form level (e.g. tree), whereas the greatest increase in inductive strength tended to occur at the folk-generic level (e.g. oak). Knowledge and induction also showed different developmental trajectories. For artifact concepts, the levels at which the greatest gains in knowledge and induction occurred were more varied, and corresponded more closely across tasks. In Experiment 3, adults reported beliefs about within-category similarity for concepts at different levels of animal, plant and artifact hierarchies, and rated inductive strength as before. For living kind concepts, expectations about category coherence predicted patterns of inductions; knowledge did not. For artifact concepts, both knowledge and expectations predicted patterns of induction. Results suggest that beliefs about conceptual coherence play an important role in guiding inductive inference, that this role may be largely independent of specific knowledge of concepts, and that such beliefs are especially important in reasoning about living kinds. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 253
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Expectations Orderings, and Conceptual Spaces
    Matías Osta-Vélez
    Peter Gärdenfors
    Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2022, 31 : 77 - 97
  • [2] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Expectations Orderings, and Conceptual Spaces
    Osta-Velez, Matias
    Gardenfors, Peter
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC LANGUAGE AND INFORMATION, 2022, 31 (01) : 77 - 97
  • [3] Inductive reasoning 2.0
    Hayes, Brett K.
    Heit, Evan
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2018, 9 (03)
  • [5] The Effects of Domain and Type of Knowledge on Category-Based Inductive Reasoning
    Crisp-Bright, Aimee Kay
    Feeney, Aidan
    COGNITION IN FLUX, 2010, : 67 - 72
  • [6] Children?s knowledge of superordinate words predicts subsequent inductive reasoning
    Suffill, Ellise
    Schonberg, Christina
    Vlach, Haley A.
    Lupyan, Gary
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 221
  • [7] Inductive Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Multi-batch Emerging Entities
    Cui, Yuanning
    Wang, Yuxin
    Sun, Zequn
    Liu, Wenqiang
    Jiang, Yiqiao
    Han, Kexin
    Hu, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, CIKM 2022, 2022, : 335 - 344
  • [8] Structured Statistical Models of Inductive Reasoning
    Kemp, Charles
    Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (01) : 20 - 58
  • [9] Properties of inductive reasoning
    Evan Heit
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2000, 7 : 569 - 592
  • [10] Inductive Reasoning Model
    Krueger, Joachim I.
    Gruening, David J.
    Heck, Patrick
    Freestone, David
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2024, 35 (01) : 11 - 25