Income Inequality and Happiness: An Inverted U-Shaped Curve

被引:35
作者
Yu, Zonghuo [1 ]
Wang, Fei [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
income inequality; Gini coefficient; happiness; curvilinear model; inflection point; UNITED-STATES; LIFE; EUROPE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02052
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Numerous studies agree that income inequality, rather than absolute income, is an important predictor of happiness. However, its specific role has been controversial. We argue that income inequality and happiness should exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship due to the dynamic competing process between two effects: when income inequality is relatively low, the signal effect will be the dominating factor, in which individuals feel happy because they consider income inequality as a signal of social mobility and expect upward mobility; however, if income inequality level increases beyond a critical point, the jealousy effect will become the dominating factor, in which individuals tend to be unhappy because they are disillusioned about the prospect of upward mobility and jealous of their wealthier peers. This hypothesis is tested in a longitudinal dataset on the United States and a cross-national dataset on several European countries. In both datasets, the Gini coefficient (a common index of a society's income inequality) and its quadratic term were significant predictors of personal happiness. Further examinations of the quadratic relationships showed that the signal effect was only presented in the European data, while the jealousy effect was presented in both datasets. These findings shed new light on our understanding of the relationship between income inequality and personal happiness.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? [J].
Alesina, A ;
Di Tella, R ;
MacCulloch, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (9-10) :2009-2042
[2]  
Alesina A, 2001, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P187
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, WELFARE STATES TRANS, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446216941
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[5]   Subjective well-being and relative poverty in rural Bangladesh [J].
Asadullah, Mohammad Niaz ;
Chaudhury, Nazmul .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 33 (05) :940-950
[6]   Money and Happiness: Rank of Income, Not Income, Affects Life Satisfaction [J].
Boyce, Christopher J. ;
Brown, Gordon D. A. ;
Moore, Simon C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (04) :471-475
[7]   The China Puzzle: Falling Happiness in a Rising Economy [J].
Brockmann, Hilke ;
Delhey, Jan ;
Welzel, Christian ;
Yuan, Hao .
JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2009, 10 (04) :387-405
[8]   Income and happiness across Europe: Do reference values matter? [J].
Caporale, Guglielmo Maria ;
Georgellis, Yannis ;
Tsitsianis, Nicholas ;
Yin, Ya Ping .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) :42-51
[9]  
Clark A E., 2006, Inequality-Aversion and Income Mobility: A Direct Test
[10]   WILL RAISING THE INCOMES OF ALL INCREASE THE HAPPINESS OF ALL [J].
EASTERLIN, RA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 27 (01) :35-47