Does a full bladder aid upper tract visualization in magnetic resonance urography?

被引:5
作者
Colville, J. A. C. [1 ]
Killeen, R. P. M. [1 ]
Buckley, O. [1 ]
Geoghegan, T. [1 ]
Regan, F. [1 ]
Hamilton, S. [1 ]
Torreggiani, W. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adelaide & Meath Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 24, Ireland
来源
AUSTRALASIAN RADIOLOGY | 2007年 / 51卷 / 04期
关键词
bladder; magnetic resonance urography; MRI; ureter;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01724.x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a full bladder improved the visualization of the upper renal tract during magnetic resonance urography (MRU). Twenty volunteers were recruited into the study. The MRU imaging was carried out on a 1.5-T MR system. Imaging was carried out in the coronal plane using a half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo-spin-echo technique. All volunteers were examined in two separate MRU studies to visualize the urinary tract. The first study was carried out with a 'full' bladder followed by a study with an 'empty' bladder, leading to a total of 40 examinations. Two radiologists then reviewed maximum intensity projection images from both 'full' and 'empty' studies independently. Both left and right upper tracts were divided into five segments. A three-point grading system was used to evaluate visualization. Excellent visualization = 3, good visualization = 2 and poor visualization = 1. Maximum score per patient was 30. Results were tabulated and analysed using an Excel database. The average score for visualization for the 'full' bladder group was 22.1/30 (73.8%) and the average score for the empty bladder was 16.2/30 (54%). Overall improvement in visualization was 5.9/30 (19.8%). There was strong interobserver agreement, with a concordance value of 92.5%. The MRU carried out in healthy young adult volunteers with a full bladder allows improved visualization of the upper tracts.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 364
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   MR urography of the ureter [J].
Blandino, A ;
Gaeta, M ;
Minutoli, F ;
Salamone, I ;
Magno, C ;
Scribano, E ;
Pandolfo, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) :1307-1314
[2]   Pediatric excretory MR urography: comparative study of enhanced and non-enhanced techniques [J].
Borthne, AS ;
Pierre-Jerome, C ;
Gjesdal, KI ;
Storaas, Y ;
Courivaud, F ;
Eriksen, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (06) :1423-1427
[3]   Diuretic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography versus intravenous urography for depiction of nondilated urinary tracts [J].
El-Diasty, T ;
Mansour, O ;
Farouk, A .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2003, 28 (01) :135-145
[4]   Filling defect artefacts in magnetic resonance urography [J].
Girish, G ;
Chooi, WK ;
Morcos, SK .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :145-150
[5]   NW urography: Evaluation of different techniques in non-dilated tracts [J].
Hughes, J ;
Jant, W ;
Goodie, J ;
Lund, R ;
Rankin, S .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 57 (11) :989-994
[6]   Magnetic resonance urography enhanced by gadolinium and diuretics:: a comparison with conventional urography in diagnosing the cause of ureteric obstruction [J].
Jung, P ;
Brauers, A ;
Nolte-Ernsting, CA ;
Jakse, G ;
Günther, RW .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (09) :960-965
[7]   CT urography and MR urography [J].
Kawashima, A ;
Glockner, JF ;
King, BF .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (05) :945-+
[8]   Use of magnetic resonance urography [J].
Klein, LT ;
Frager, D ;
Subramanium, A ;
Lowe, FC .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :602-608
[9]   MR urography today [J].
Nolte-Ernsting, CCA ;
Staatz, G ;
Tacke, J ;
Günther, RW .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 28 (02) :191-209
[10]   Magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and spinal dysraphism [J].
Shipstone, DP ;
Thomas, DG ;
Darwent, G ;
Morcos, SK .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 89 (07) :658-664