A unified approach for synthesizing population-level covariate effect information in semiparametric estimation with survival data

被引:18
作者
Huang, Chiung-Yu [1 ]
Qin, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 550 16 St, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[2] NIAID, Biostat Res Branch, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
information synthesis; meta-analysis; misspecified models; subgroup analysis; surveillance; epidemiology; and end results cancer registries; EMPIRICAL-LIKELIHOOD; BREAST-CANCER; CALIBRATION ESTIMATORS; AUXILIARY INFORMATION; GENERALIZED-METHOD; REGRESSION-MODELS; RISK; MISSPECIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8499
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There has been a growing interest in developing methodologies to combine information from public domains to improve efficiency in the analysis of relatively small-scale studies that collect more detailed patient-level information. The auxiliary information is usually given in the form of summary statistics or regression coefficients. Thus, the question arises as to how to incorporate the summary information in the model estimation procedure. In this article, we consider statistical analysis of right-censored survival data when additional information about the covariate effects evaluated in a reduced Cox model is available. Recognizing that such external information can be summarized using population moments, we present a unified framework by employing the generalized method of moments to combine information from different sources for the analysis of survival data. The proposed estimator can be shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal; moreover, it is more efficient than the maximum partial likelihood estimator. We also consider incorporating uncertainty of the external information in the inference procedure. Simulation studies show that, by incorporating the additional summary information, the proposed estimators enjoy a substantial gain in efficiency over the conventional approach. A data analysis of a pancreatic cancer cohort study is presented to illustrate the methods and theory.
引用
收藏
页码:1573 / 1590
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY [J].
ANDERSEN, PK ;
GILL, RD .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :1100-1120
[2]   MODEL MISSPECIFICATION IN PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS REGRESSION [J].
ANDERSON, GL ;
FLEMING, TR .
BIOMETRIKA, 1995, 82 (03) :527-541
[3]   ASYMPTOTIC EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION WITH CONDITIONAL MOMENT RESTRICTIONS [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1987, 34 (03) :305-334
[4]   Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-Level Information From External Big Data Sources [J].
Chatterjee, Nilanjan ;
Chen, Yi-Hau ;
Maas, Paige ;
Carroll, Raymond J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 111 (513) :107-117
[5]   Generalized linear models incorporating population level information: an empirical-likelihood-based approach [J].
Chaudhuri, Sanjay ;
Handcock, Mark S. ;
Rendall, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2008, 70 :311-328
[6]   Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation [J].
Chaudhuri, Sanjay ;
Mondal, Debashis ;
Yin, Teng .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2017, 79 (01) :293-320
[7]  
Chen JH, 1999, STAT SINICA, V9, P385
[8]  
CHEN JH, 1993, BIOMETRIKA, V80, P107, DOI 10.1093/biomet/80.1.107
[9]   Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density [J].
Chen, Jinbo ;
Pee, David ;
Ayyagari, Rajeev ;
Graubard, Barry ;
Schairer, Catherine ;
Byrne, Celia ;
Benichou, Jacques ;
Gail, Mitchell H. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1215-1226
[10]   Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence [J].
Costantino, JP ;
Gail, MH ;
Pee, D ;
Anderson, S ;
Redmond, CK ;
Benichou, J ;
Wieand, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (18) :1541-1548