Enhancing software development through project-based learning and the quality of planning

被引:2
作者
Feris, Marco Antonio Amaral [1 ]
Goffin, Keith [2 ]
Zwikael, Ofer [3 ]
Fan, Di [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Business & Law, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Stockholm Sch Econ, Dept Entrepreneurship Innovat & Technol, Sveavagen 65, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Res Sch Management, LF Crisp Bid 26, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Hung Hom, Kowloon, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; TACIT KNOWLEDGE; TIME PRESSURE; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; DESIGN SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; NPD;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12435
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
R&D plays a crucial role in developing new products, the commercialisation of which can drive corporate growth. Over three decades, research has focused the new product development (NPD) process and it is known that developing new products is a knowledge-intensive, risky activity. Since industry surveys show that many NPD projects, particularly software-based ones, fail to meet their schedules and objectives. Consequently, today's R&D managers still need ways to plan and conduct NPD more effectively. Project-based Learning (PBL) - the generation of specific technical and process knowledge during and after a project - is a potential way to improve NPD. Therefore, this paper investigated the research question: Does PBL enhance the quality of planning in subsequent software development projects? The study used a sample of 47 software development projects at three multinational organisations. Significantly, the findings show that PBL does enhance the quality of planning of subsequent software development projects. In particular, the quality of planning is increased in projects with high levels of uncertainty; where team members work in a project-based structure with strong collaboration; and when the pressure to deliver projects is high. The contribution of the research at a theoretical level is that it identified an important link between learning and the quality of planning in subsequent NPD projects. At a practical level, the study identifies specific steps R&D managers can take to improve the performance of software development projects, with all their associated challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 467
页数:21
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   Knowledge transfers and project-based learning in large scale infrastructure development projects: an exploratory and comparative ex-post analysis [J].
Aerts, Geoffrey ;
Dooms, Michael ;
Haezendonck, Elvira .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (03) :224-240
[2]   New Product Development: Impact of Project Characteristics and Development Practices on Performance [J].
Ahmad, Sohel ;
Mallick, Debasish N. ;
Schroeder, Roger G. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 30 (02) :331-348
[3]   Team wisdom in software development projects and its impact on project performance [J].
Akgun, Ali E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 50 :228-243
[4]   Knowledge sharing in project-based organizations: Overcoming the informational limbo [J].
Almeida, Maria Vaz ;
Soares, Antonio Lucas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (06) :770-779
[5]  
Amaral Feris M.A., 2017, P R D MAN C LEUV
[6]   Post-project reviews as a key project management competence [J].
Anbari, Frank T. ;
Carayannis, Elias G. ;
Voetsch, Robert James .
TECHNOVATION, 2008, 28 (10) :633-643
[7]  
Andreessen M., 2011, WALL STREET J
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Learning in the field: an introduction to qualitative research
[9]   Organizational Learning and Management of Technology [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Hora, Manpreet .
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (04) :579-590
[10]   Managing the project learning paradox: A set-theoretic approach toward project knowledge transfer [J].
Bakker, Rene M. ;
Cambre, Bart ;
Korlaar, Leonique ;
Raab, Joerg .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (05) :494-503