Gravitropism in the starch excess mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana

被引:55
|
作者
Vitha, Stanislav
Yang, Ming
Sack, Fred D.
Kiss, John Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Bot, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Microscopy & Imaging Ctr, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Bot, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Bot, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
关键词
amyloplast; Arabidopsis thaliana; columella; endodermis; gravitropism; starch excess mutant; statolith;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.94.4.590
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Amyloplasts are hypothesized to play a key role in the cellular mechanisms of gravity perception in plants. While previous studies have examined the effects of starch deficiency on gravitropic sensitivity, in this paper, we report on gravitropism in plants with a greater amount of starch relative to the normal wild type. Thus, we have studied the sex1 (starch excess) mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, which accumulates extra starch because it is defective in a protein involved in the regulation of starch mobilization. Compared to the wild type (WT), sex1 seedlings contained excess starch in cotyledons, hypocotyls, the root-hypocotyl transition zone, the body of the root, root hairs, and in peripheral rootcap, cells. Sedimented amyloplasts were found in both the WT and in sex1 in the rootcap columella and in the endodermis of stems, hypocotyls, and petioles. In roots, the starch content and amyloplast sedimentation in central columella cells and the gravitropic sensitivity were comparable in sex1 and the WT. However. in hypocotyls, the sex1 mutant was much more sensitive to gravity during light-grown conditions compared to the WT. This difference was correlated to a major difference in size of plastids in gravity-perceiving endodermal cells between the two genotypes (i.e.. sex1 amyloplasts were twice as big). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that only very large changes in starch content relative to the WT affect gravitropic sensitivity, thus indicating that wild-type sensing is not saturated.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 598
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] CIRCUMNUTATION AND GRAVITROPISM CAUSE ROOT WAVING IN ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA
    SIMMONS, C
    SOLL, D
    MIGLIACCIO, F
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1995, 46 (282) : 143 - 150
  • [12] Interaction of light and gravitropism with nutation of hypocotyls of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings
    Vladimir Orbović*
    Kenneth L. Poff
    Plant Growth Regulation, 1997, 23 : 141 - 146
  • [13] The RHG gene is involved in root and hypocotyl gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Fukaki, H
    Fujisawa, H
    Tasaka, M
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 38 (07) : 804 - 810
  • [14] GRAVITROPISM IN ROOTS OF INTERMEDIATE-STARCH MUTANTS OF ARABIDOPSIS
    KISS, JZ
    CASPAR, T
    WRIGHT, JB
    MILLER, AJ
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 108 (02) : 24 - 24
  • [15] Abscisic acid is a negative regulator of root gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Han, Woong
    Rong, Honglin
    Zhang, Hanma
    Wang, Myeong-Hyeon
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 378 (04) : 695 - 700
  • [16] Gravitropism in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.
    Mano, E
    Horiguchi, G
    Tsukaya, H
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [17] Genetic analysis of Arabidopsis shoot gravitropism 9 mutant
    Nakamura, M
    Morita, MT
    Tasaka, M
    PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 47 : S115 - S115
  • [18] MOLECULAR AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF GRAVITROPISM MUTANTS IN ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA
    SIMMONS, CR
    GARBERS, C
    DELONG, A
    MASSON, P
    CASPAR, T
    SOLL, D
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 102 (01) : 119 - 119
  • [19] Genetic evidence that the endodermis is essential for shoot gravitropism in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Fukaki, H
    Wysocka-Diller, J
    Kato, T
    Fujisawa, H
    Benfey, PN
    Tasaka, M
    PLANT JOURNAL, 1998, 14 (04): : 425 - 430
  • [20] Interaction of light and gravitropism with nutation of hypocotyls of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings
    Orbovic, V
    Poff, KL
    PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1997, 23 (03) : 141 - 146