Field Experiments on Social Media

被引:26
|
作者
Mosleh, Mohsen [1 ,2 ]
Pennycook, Gordon [3 ,4 ]
Rand, David G. [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Sci Innovat Technol & Entrepreneurship Dept, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Regina, Hill Levene Sch Business, Regina, SK, Canada
[4] Univ Regina, Dept Psychol, Regina, SK, Canada
[5] MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, Cambridge, MA USA
[6] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
ecological validity; fake news; field experiments; misinformation; political psychology; social media;
D O I
10.1177/09637214211054761
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Online behavioral data, such as digital traces from social media, have the potential to allow researchers an unprecedented new window into human behavior in ecologically valid everyday contexts. However, research using such data is often purely observational, which limits its usefulness for identifying causal relationships. Here we review recent innovations in experimental approaches to studying online behavior, with a particular focus on research related to misinformation and political psychology. In hybrid lab-field studies, exposure to social-media content can be randomized, and the impact on attitudes and beliefs can be measured using surveys, or exposure to treatments can be randomized within survey experiments, and their impact on subsequent online behavior can be observed. In field experiments conducted on social media, randomized treatments can be administered directly to users in the online environment (e.g., via social-tie invitations, private messages, or public posts) without revealing that they are part of an experiment, and the effects on subsequent online behavior can then be observed. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach are discussed, along with practical advice and central ethical constraints on such studies.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 75
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public attitudes towards social media field experiments
    Straub, Vincent J.
    Burton, Jason W.
    Geers, Michael
    Lorenz-Spreen, Philipp
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [2] Experiments in Social Media
    Walsh, Toby
    AI MAGAZINE, 2019, 40 (04) : 74 - 77
  • [3] Conservation fundraising: Evidence from social media and traditional mail field experiments
    Kubo, Takahiro
    Yokoo, Hide-Fumi
    Verissimo, Diogo
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2023, 16 (01):
  • [4] Field Experiments on Social Conflict
    Pruitt, Dean G.
    INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATION-A JOURNAL OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 10 (01): : 33 - 49
  • [5] Employer Branding and Recruitment: Social Media Field Experiments Targeting Future Public Employees
    Keppeler, Florian
    Papenfuss, Ulf
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2021, 81 (04) : 763 - 775
  • [6] Public attitudes towards social media field experiments (vol 14, 26110, 2024)
    Straub, Vincent J.
    Burton, Jason W.
    Geers, Michael
    Lorenz-Spreen, Philipp
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [7] Null effects of social media ads on voter registration: Three digital field experiments
    Unan, Asli
    John, Peter
    Foos, Florian
    Cheng-Matsuno, Vanessa
    RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [8] Testing Work-Life Theory in Marketing: Evidence from Field Experiments on Social Media
    Umashankar, Nita
    Grewal, Dhruv
    Guha, Abhijit
    Bohling, Timothy R. R.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2024, 61 (02) : 307 - 329
  • [9] Field Experiments Across the Social Sciences
    Baldassarri, Delia
    Abascal, Maria
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 43, 2017, 43 : 41 - 73
  • [10] The digital media field and social differentiation
    Pccourt Gracia, Juan
    POLITICA Y SOCIEDAD, 2021, 58 (01):