Prevention of catheter-related venous thrombosis with nadroparin in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

被引:72
作者
Niers, T. M. H.
Di Nisio, M.
Klerk, C. P. W.
Baarslag, H. J.
Bueller, H. R.
Biemond, B. J.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Med, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Lab Expt Internal Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ G dAnnunzio, Univ Fdn, Sch Med, Dept Med & Aging, Pescara, Italy
[5] Univ G dAnnunzio, Univ Fdn, Aging Res Ctr, Pescara, Italy
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Cell Biol & Histol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Meander Med Ctr, Dept Radiodiag, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[8] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Haematol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
catheter-related central venous thrombosis; chemotherapy; nadroparin; patients with hematologic malignancies;
D O I
10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02660.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hemato-oncology patients treated with intensive chemotherapy usually require the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are frequently complicated by catheter-related central venous thrombosis (CVT), which has been associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism and catheter-related infection. Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with s.c. low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) administered once daily in a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies requiring intensive chemotherapy including autologous stem cell transplantation were eligible. The patients were randomized to receive nadroparin 2850 antifactor Xa units once daily or placebo s.c. for 3 weeks. Venography was performed on day 21 after CVC insertion. Secondary outcomes were bleeding and catheter-related infection. Results: In total, 113 patients were randomized to nadroparin or placebo, and 87 patients (77%) underwent venography. In total, I I venographically proven catheter-related CVTs were diagnosed. The frequency of catheter-related CVT was not significantly different between study groups, namely four catheter-related CVTs in the placebo group [9%; 95% CI: 0.002-0.16] vs. seven catheter-related CVTs in the nadroparin group (17%; 95% Cl: 0.06-0.28). In addition, no difference in the incidence of catheter-related infection or bleeding was observed between the groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the actual risk for catheter-related CVT in patients with hematologic malignancies is lower than suggested in earlier studies in cancer patients. Although prophylactic administration of nadroparin appeared to be safe in this group of patients with a high risk of bleeding, it cannot be recommended for the prevention of catheter-related CVT or catheter-related infection in patients with hematologic malignancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1878 / 1882
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Central venous thrombosis: An early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter. A prospective study
    DeCicco, M
    Matovic, M
    Balestreri, L
    Panarello, G
    Fantin, D
    Morassut, S
    Testa, V
    [J]. THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1997, 86 (02) : 101 - 113
  • [12] LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF HEPARIN-ASSOCIATED THROMBOCYTOPENIA AND COMPARISON OF PLATELET-AGGREGATION TEST, HEPARIN-INDUCED PLATELET ACTIVATION TEST, AND PLATELET FACTOR-4 HEPARIN ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY
    GREINACHER, A
    AMIRAL, J
    DUMMEL, V
    VISSAC, A
    KIEFEL, V
    MUELLERECKHARDT, C
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 1994, 34 (05) : 381 - 385
  • [13] Dalteparin for prevention of catheter-related complications in cancer patients with central venous catheters:: final results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial
    Karthaus, M
    Kretzschmar, A
    Kröning, H
    Biakhov, M
    Irwin, D
    Marschner, N
    Slabber, C
    Fountzilas, G
    Garin, A
    Abecasis, NGF
    Baronius, W
    Steger, GG
    Südhoff, T
    Giorgetti, C
    Reichardt, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [14] Catheter-associated thrombosis: Thromboprophylaxis or not?
    Levine, M
    Kakkar, AK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (18) : 4006 - 4008
  • [15] Prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis with minidose warfarin in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation: Retrospective analysis of 228 cancer patients
    Magagnoli, M
    Masci, G
    Castagna, L
    Pedicini, V
    Poretti, D
    Morenghi, E
    Brambilla, G
    Santoro, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2006, 81 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [16] Monreal M, 1996, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V75, P251
  • [17] MONREAL M, 1994, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V72, P548
  • [18] UPPER-EXTREMITY DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS AND PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    MONREAL, M
    LAFOZ, E
    RUIZ, J
    VALLS, R
    ALASTRUE, A
    [J]. CHEST, 1991, 99 (02) : 280 - 283
  • [19] Attributable morbidity and mortality of catheter-related septicemia in critically ill patients: A matched, risk-adjusted, cohort study
    Soufir, L
    Timsit, JF
    Mahe, C
    Carlet, J
    Regnier, B
    Chevret, S
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (06) : 396 - 401
  • [20] Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients - Incidence, risks factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis
    Timsit, JF
    Farkas, JC
    Boyer, JM
    Martin, JB
    Misset, B
    Renaud, B
    Carlet, J
    [J]. CHEST, 1998, 114 (01) : 207 - 213