Why 'financialisation' hasn't depressed US productive investment

被引:158
作者
Kliman, Andrew [1 ]
Williams, Shannon D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pace Univ, Pleasantville, NY 10570 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Financialisation; Neoliberalism; Capital Accumulation; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; IDEOLOGY;
D O I
10.1093/cje/beu033
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The rate of capital accumulation in the USA has fallen markedly in recent decades. Works in the financialisation literature have tried to explain this phenomenon by arguing that rising financial payments and purchases have come at the expense of productive investment. This article shows that such arguments are not supported by the data. It also explains theoretically why rising dividend payments and the growth of corporations' portfolio investment are compatible with the fact that corporations' productive investment did not decline during the first two decades of 'neoliberalism' in the USA. There would necessarily be a trade-off between these uses of funds if they were all funded out of current profits, but there is no necessary trade-off because borrowed funds are an additional source. Finally, the article shows that the fall in US corporations' rate of profit (rate of return on investment in fixed assets) fully accounts for the fall in their rate of capital accumulation.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 92
页数:26
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HDB POLITICAL EC FIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 149 POL EC RES I
[3]  
Chernomas R., 2012, PROFIT ACCUMULATION
[4]  
Davis Gerald., 2009, Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America
[5]  
Dobbin F, 2005, POLIT POWER SOC THEO, V17, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0198-8719(04)17006-3
[6]  
Dumenil G., 2011, The crisis of neoliberalism
[7]  
Dumenil Gerard., 2004, CAPITAL RESURGENT
[8]  
Fligstein N, 2005, POLIT POWER SOC THEO, V17, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0198-8719(04)17010-5
[9]  
Gowan P, 2009, NEW LEFT REV, P5
[10]  
Husson M., 2009, COUTS HIST A KLIMAN