The impact of expanded health insurance coverage for unauthorized pregnant women on prenatal care utilization

被引:13
作者
Atkins, Danielle N. [1 ]
Held, Mary L. [2 ]
Lindley, Lisa C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Hlth Management & Informat, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Coll Social Work, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Coll Nursing, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
difference-in-difference; Medicaid; prenatal care; unauthorized; PREPREGNANCY OBESITY; BIRTH OUTCOMES; WELFARE-REFORM; INFANT HEALTH; POPULATION; DIFFERENCE; IMMIGRANTS; ADEQUACY; US;
D O I
10.1111/phn.12524
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of expanding Medicaid health insurance coverage for unauthorized women on prenatal care utilization. Design and Sample Measures A natural experiment design was used. We examined the prenatal care utilization of 20,876 unauthorized women from Nebraska, which expanded Medicaid coverage for unauthorized women, and South Carolina, which has never expanded coverage. Measurements of prenatal care utilization included adequate prenatal care using the Kotelchuck Index and the number of prenatal care visits. The policy independent variable of interest was an interaction between the policy years (2007-2009) and Nebraska residence. Demographic characteristics were included as covariates. Analysis entailed a difference-in-difference approach to compare prenatal care utilization by state, both before and after legislation was passed to fund care among unauthorized women in Nebraska. Results Conclusions Women with insurance coverage were more likely to utilize prenatal services. Unauthorized women living in Nebraska during Medicaid expansion were 28% more likely to receive adequate prenatal care (OR = 1.28, p < 0.01) and had about one more prenatal care visit (IRR = 1.05, p < 0.01) than women who did not have expanded Medicaid coverage. Findings have important public health policy implications to support improved birth outcomes among native-born infants of unauthorized women.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], PORTRAIT UNAUTHORIZE
[4]  
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[5]   Prepregnancy Obesity and Birth Outcomes [J].
Averett, Susan L. ;
Fletcher, Erin K. .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (03) :655-664
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008, BIRTH DEF DAT STAT
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013, GUID PREV BIRTH DEF
[8]  
Child Trends, 2015, LAT PREN CAR IND CHI
[9]   Maternal health: does prenatal care make a difference? [J].
Conway, KS ;
Kutinova, A .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (05) :461-488
[10]   Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the 'devil' in the distribution? [J].
Conway, KS ;
Deb, P .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (03) :489-513