Edge chipping resistance and flexural strength of polymer infiltrated ceramic network and resin nanoceramic restorative materials

被引:44
作者
Argyrou, Renos [1 ]
Thompson, Geoffrey A. [2 ]
Cho, Seok-Hwan [2 ]
Berzins, David W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, Sch Dent, 1801 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[2] Marquette Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Gen Dent Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
关键词
FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVES; COMPOSITE; FABRICATION; BLOCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Two novel restorative materials, a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and a resin nanoceramic (RNC), for computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) applications have recently become commercially available. Little independent evidence regarding their mechanical properties exists to facilitate material selection. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the edge chipping resistance and flexural strength of the PICN and RNC materials and compare them with 2 commonly used feldspathic ceramic (FC) and leucite reinforced glass-ceramic (LRGC) CAD-CAM materials that share the same clinical indications. Material and methods. PICN, RNC, FC, and LRGC material specimens were obtained by sectioning commercially available CAD-CAM blocks. Edge chipping test specimens (n=20/material) were adhesively attached to a resin substrate before testing. Edge chips were produced using a 120 degree, sharp, conical diamond indenter mounted on a universal testing machine and positioned 0.1 to 0.7 mm horizontally from the specimen's edge. The chipping force was plotted against distance to the edge, and the data were fitted to linear and quadratic equations. One-way ANOVA determined intergroup differences (alpha=.05) in edge chipping toughness. Beam specimens (n=22/material) were tested for determining flexural strength using a 3-point bend test. Weibull statistics determined intergroup differences (alpha=.05). Flexural modulus and work of fracture were also calculated, and 1-way ANOVA determined intergroup differences (alpha=.05) Results. Significant (P<.05) differences were found among the 4 CAD-CAM materials for the 4 mechanical properties. Specifically, the material rankings were edge chipping toughness: RNC>LRGC=FC>PICN; flexural strength: RNC=LRGC>PICN>FC; flexural modulus: RNC<PICN <LRGC<FC; and work of fracture: RNC>LRGC=PICN>FC. Conclusions. The RNC material demonstrated superior performance for the mechanical properties tested compared with the other 3 materials.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abernethy R, 2006, NEW WEIBULL HDB, P7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, COMPEND CONTIN ED DE
[3]   Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? [J].
Anusavice, K. F. ;
Kakar, Kunian ;
Ferree, N. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 :218-231
[4]   Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials [J].
Awada, Abdallah ;
Nathanson, Dan .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (04) :587-593
[5]  
Burke F J T, 2002, Dent Update, V29, P188
[6]   Hertzian contact response and damage tolerance of dental ceramics [J].
Coldea, Andrea ;
Swain, Michael V. ;
Thiel, Norbert .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2014, 34 :124-133
[7]  
Davidowitz Gary, 2011, Dent Clin North Am, V55, P559, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011
[8]  
Della Bona A, 2008, J AM DENT ASSOC, V139, p8S
[9]   Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material [J].
Della Bona, Alvaro ;
Corazza, Pedro H. ;
Zhang, Yu .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (05) :564-569
[10]   Emerging Ceramic-based Materials for Dentistry [J].
Denry, I. ;
Kelly, J. R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 93 (12) :1235-1242