DNA-PK-independent rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cell extracts in vitro

被引:27
作者
Cheong, N [1 ]
Perrault, AR [1 ]
Wang, H [1 ]
Wachberger, P [1 ]
Mammen, P [1 ]
Jackson, I [1 ]
Iliakis, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/095530099140825
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the role of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) in the rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (dsb). Materials and methods: This study employed previously described in vitro assays that utilize nuclei or 'naked' DNA prepared from agarose-embedded cells as a substrate and S-HeLa cell extracts as a source of enzymes. Rejoining of dsb in these assays is absolutely dependent on cell extract and it proceeds, under optimal reaction conditions, to an extent similar to that observed in intact cells. Results were confirmed in a plasmid-based assay for in vitro rejoining of dsb. Results: It is shown that concentrations of wortmannin completely inhibiting DNA-PK activity profoundly affect the rejoining df dsb in vivo, but have no effect on dsb rejoining in vitro. Furthermore, fractionation of cell extracts using ammonium sulphate precipitation, generates protein fractions that are able to support dsb rejoining, despite the fact that they do not contain detectable amounts of either DNA-PKcs or Ku80. Efficient rejoining of dsb in vitro is also observed with extracts of MO59J cells that lack DNA-PK activity. Finally, rejoining of dsb remains unaffected by wortmannin in a plasmid-based assay, and is also detectable with extracts of MO59J cells. Conclusions: These findings are in contrast with genetic studies demonstrating a requirement for DNA-PK activity for efficient rejoining of dsb in vivo. The difference between in vitro and in vivo results may not be attributed to chromatin structure since wortmannin was without an effect when using nuclei as a substrate. It is speculated that the differences between in vivo and in vitro results can be explained either by assuming the operation of multiple pathways in dsb rejoining, some of which do not require DNA-PK, or by postulating a purely regulatory/damage sensing role for DNA-PK in intact cells but no direct involvement in dsb rejoining.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Anderson CW, 1996, CURR TOP MICROBIOL, V217, P91
  • [2] DNA-BASE AND STRAND DAMAGE IN X-IRRADIATED MONKEY CV-1 CELLS - INFLUENCE OF PRETREATMENT USING SMALL DOSES OF RADIATION
    BASES, R
    HAMORI, I
    PIAZZA, L
    MAIO, J
    MENDEZ, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1990, 58 (01) : 35 - 54
  • [3] DNA END-JOINING IN EXTRACTS FROM HUMAN-CELLS
    BOE, SO
    SODROSKI, J
    HELLAND, DE
    FARNET, CM
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 215 (03) : 987 - 993
  • [4] Wortmannin is a potent inhibitor of DNA double strand break but not single strand break repair in Chinese hamster ovary cells
    Boulton, S
    Kyle, S
    Yalcintepe, L
    Durkacz, BW
    [J]. CARCINOGENESIS, 1996, 17 (11) : 2285 - 2290
  • [5] Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: Roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance
    Boulton, SJ
    Jackson, SP
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (23) : 4639 - 4648
  • [6] Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways
    Boulton, SJ
    Jackson, SP
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 1996, 15 (18) : 5093 - 5103
  • [7] CHANG C, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P1244
  • [8] Cheong N, 1997, INT J RADIAT BIOL, V71, P365
  • [9] In vitro rejoining of double-strand breaks in cellular DNA by factors present in extracts of HeLa cells
    Cheong, N
    Okayasu, R
    Shah, S
    Ganguly, T
    Mammen, P
    Iliakis, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (06) : 665 - 677
  • [10] Mechanisms of nonhomologous DNA end-joining in frogs, mice and men
    Daza, P
    Reichenberger, S
    Gottlich, B
    Hagmann, M
    Feldmann, E
    Pfeiffer, P
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 377 (12) : 775 - 786