Female plastic and reconstructive surgeons' personal decision making for breast cancer treatment and reconstruction

被引:7
作者
Al-Benna, Sammy [1 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, London EC1A 7BE, England
关键词
Breast cancer; Ablative surgery; Reconstructive surgery; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CONSERVING SURGERY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CARCINOMA; CAUTION; THERAPY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-010-1721-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
No original articles have been published exploring female surgeons' preferences for breast cancer treatment and reconstruction if they were to be diagnosed with breast cancer. 107 female breast plastic and reconstructive surgeons were surveyed as to the methods of breast cancer treatment and reconstruction they would opt for if they were diagnosed with a 2 cm invasive breast carcinoma. 75% stated that they would opt for mastectomy rather than undergo breast conserving surgery and radiation (21%). Most (95%) of those choosing a mastectomy would opt for reconstruction. For reconstruction choices, 50% of those surveyed would have autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue (38% deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; 12% transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap). 26% would choose tissue expansion with implant and 19% would opt for a latissimus dorsi flap. For those choosing tissue expansion with implant reconstruction 64% would choose a silicone implant, 9% would choose a saline implant and 27% felt either type of implant would be acceptable. For those choosing latissimus dorsi flap with implant reconstruction, 69% would choose a silicone implant, 13% would choose a saline implant and 19% felt either type of implant would be acceptable. Female surgeons offer an exclusive insight into surgical outcomes following breast cancer therapy and reconstruction. This study suggests that due to their clinical experiences they have knowledge as to outcomes and consequences of breast cancer treatment and reconstruction and their choices do not always adhere to current guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 741
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Caution note on the use of the internal mammary artery in breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Benna, S ;
Grob, M ;
Mosahebi, A ;
Dheansa, BS ;
Pereira, J .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (05) :1653-1654
[3]   Postablative Reconstruction Is Better Terminology than Oncoplastic Surgery [J].
Al-Benna, Sammy ;
Steinstraesser, Lars .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (06) :463E-464E
[4]   Abdominoplasty Consent Forms Do Not Caution against the Potential Loss of a Reconstructive Option for Breast Reconstruction [J].
Al-Benna, Sammy ;
Al-Busaidi, Said S. ;
Papadimitriou, Georgios ;
Schonauer, Fabrizio ;
Steinstrasser, Lars .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (06) :208E-209E
[5]  
ALBENNA S, 2010, BREAST 0602
[6]   Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer [J].
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Waijee, Jennifer ;
Mujahid, Mahasin ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Katz, Steven J. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (03) :489-494
[7]   Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction [J].
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Waljee, Jennifer ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Katz, Steven J. .
CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) :1715-1720
[8]   Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study [J].
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (01) :7-12
[9]   Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Le, MG ;
Rochard, F ;
Contesso, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1558-1564
[10]   Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Virnig, BA ;
Durham, SB ;
Tuttle, TM .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (06) :443-448