Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Selection Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates and Mortality Among Patients Enrolled in the NCDR Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry

被引:130
作者
Dewland, Thomas A. [2 ]
Pellegrini, Cara N. [3 ,5 ]
Wang, Yongfei [4 ]
Marcus, Gregory M. [3 ]
Keung, Edmund [3 ,5 ]
Varosy, Paul D. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Denver Vet Affairs Med Ctr, VA Eastern Colorado Hlth Care Syst, Denver, CO 80220 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Cardiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Electrophysiol Sect, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] VA Med Ctr San Francisco, Cardiol Sect, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Colorado Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Grp, Denver, CO USA
关键词
complication; defibrillator; dual-chamber ICD; DETECTION ENHANCEMENTS; INAPPROPRIATE THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to compare single-versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation and complication rates in a large, real-world population. Background The majority of patients enrolled in ICD efficacy trials received single-chamber devices. Although dual-chamber ICDs offer theoretical advantages over single-chamber defibrillators, the clinical superiority of dual-chamber models has not been conclusively proven, and they may increase complications. Methods The National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry was used to examine the association between baseline characteristics and device selection in 104,049 patients receiving single-and dual-chamber ICDs between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2007. A longitudinal cohort design was then used to determine in-hospital complication rates. Results Dual-chamber devices were implanted in 64,489 patients (62%). Adverse events were more frequent with dual-chamber than with single-chamber device implantation (3.17% vs. 2.11%, p < 0.001), as was the rate of inhospital mortality (0.40% vs. 0.23%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for demographics, medical comorbidities, diagnostic test data, and ICD indication, the odds of any complication (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.28 to 1.52; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 1.45; 95% confidence interval: 1.20 to 1.74; p < 0.001) were increased with dual-chamber versus single-chamber ICD implantation. Conclusions In this large, multicenter cohort of patients, dual-chamber ICD use was common. Dual-chamber device implantation was associated with increases in periprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality compared with single-chamber defibrillator selection. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1007-13) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1013
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Dual-chamber defibrillators reduce clinically significant adverse events compared with single-chamber devices: results from the DATAS (Dual chamber and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias Adverse events Study) trial [J].
Almendral, Jesus ;
Arribas, Fernando ;
Wolpert, Christian ;
Ricci, Renato ;
Adragao, Pedro ;
Cobo, Erik ;
Navarro, Xavier ;
Quesada, Aurelio .
EUROPACE, 2008, 10 (05) :528-535
[2]  
Bardy GH, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, V352, P2146
[3]  
Bonow RO, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, pE1, DOI [10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.014, 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007]
[4]   Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study [J].
Deisenhofer, I ;
Kolb, C ;
Ndrepepa, G ;
Schreieck, J ;
Karch, M ;
Schmieder, S ;
Zrenner, B ;
Schmitt, C .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (02) :134-142
[5]   Randomized controlled study of detection enhancements versus rate-only detection to prevent inappropriate therapy in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [J].
Dorian, P ;
Philippon, F ;
Thibault, B ;
Kimber, S ;
Sterns, L ;
Greene, M ;
Newman, D ;
Gelaznikas, R ;
Barr, A .
HEART RHYTHM, 2004, 1 (05) :540-547
[6]   Dual-chamber versus single-chamber detection enhancements for implantable defibrillator rhythm diagnosis - The detect supraventricular tachycardia study [J].
Friedman, PA ;
McClelland, RL ;
Bamlet, WR ;
Acosta, H ;
Kessler, D ;
Munger, TM ;
Kavesh, NG ;
Wood, M ;
Daoud, E ;
Massumi, A ;
Schuger, C ;
Shorofsky, S ;
Wilkoff, B ;
Glikson, M .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (25) :2871-2879
[7]   Cost advantage of dual-chamber versus single-chamber cardioverter-defibriflator implantation [J].
Goldberger, Z ;
Elbel, B ;
McPherson, CA ;
Paltiel, AD ;
Lampert, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (05) :850-857
[8]   Review of the Registry's Fourth Year, Incorporating Lead Data and Pediatric ICD Procedures, and Use as a National Performance Measure [J].
Hammill, Stephen C. ;
Kremers, Mark S. ;
Stevenson, Lynne Warner ;
Heidenreich, Paul A. ;
Lang, Christine M. ;
Curtis, Jeptha P. ;
Wang, Yongfei ;
Berul, Charles I. ;
Kadish, Alan H. ;
Al-Khatib, Sana M. ;
Pina, Ileana L. ;
Walsh, Mary Norine ;
Mirro, Michael J. ;
Lindsay, Bruce D. ;
Reynolds, Matthew R. ;
Pontzer, Kathryn ;
Blum, Laura ;
Masoudi, Frederick ;
Rumsfeld, John ;
Brindis, Ralph G. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2010, 7 (09) :1340-1345
[9]   Evaluation of Early Complications Related to De Novo Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Insights From the Ontario ICD Database [J].
Lee, Douglas S. ;
Krahn, Andrew D. ;
Healey, Jeffrey S. ;
Birnie, David ;
Crystal, Eugene ;
Dorian, Paul ;
Simpson, Christopher S. ;
Khaykin, Yaariv ;
Cameron, Douglas ;
Janmohamed, Amir ;
Yee, Raymond ;
Austin, Peter C. ;
Chen, Zhongliang ;
Hardy, Judy ;
Tu, Jack V. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (08) :774-782
[10]  
McAnulty J, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V337, P1576