Estimating everyday portion size using a 'method of constant stimuli': In a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI

被引:60
作者
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Rogers, Peter J. [1 ]
Pothos, Emmanuel M. [2 ]
Calitri, Raff [2 ]
Tapper, Katy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
[2] Swansea Univ, Dept Psychol, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
portion size; hunger; psychophysics; BMI; method of constant stimuli; dietary restraint; dieting; probit analysis; energy expenditure; energy intake;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper (i) explores the proposition that body weight is associated with large portion sizes and (ii) introduces a new technique for measuring everyday portion size. In our paradigm, the participant is shown a picture of a food portion and is asked to indicate whether it is larger or smaller than their usual portion. After responding to a range of different portions an estimate of everyday portion size is calculated using probit analysis. Importantly, this estimate is likely to be robust because it is based on many responses. First-year undergraduate students (N = 151) completed our procedure for 12 commonly consumed foods. As expected, portion sizes were predicted by gender and by a measure of dieting and dietary restraint. Furthermore, consistent with reports of hungry supermarket shoppers, portion-size estimates tended to be higher in hungry individuals. However, we found no evidence for a relationship between BMI and portion size in any of the test foods. We consider reasons why this finding should be anticipated. In particular, we suggest that the difference in total energy expenditure of individuals with a higher and lower BMI is too small to be detected as a concomitant difference in portion size (at least in our sample). (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   NUTRITION EPIDEMIOLOGY - HOW DO WE KNOW WHAT THEY ATE [J].
BARRETTCONNOR, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1991, 54 (01) :S182-S187
[2]  
Black AE, 1996, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V50, P72
[3]  
BRUNSTROM JM, APPETITE IN PRESS
[4]   Characteristics of self-selected portion size in young adults [J].
Burger, Kyle S. ;
Kern, Mark ;
Coleman, Karen J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2007, 107 (04) :611-618
[5]  
DODD DK, 1977, INT J OBESITY, V1, P43
[6]   ADAPTIVE PROBIT ESTIMATION AND BODY SIZE - THE EVALUATION OF A NEW PSYCHOPHYSICAL TECHNIQUE [J].
FONAGY, P ;
BENSTER, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 81 :159-171
[7]  
Gregory J, 1990, DIETARY NUTR SURVEY
[8]   SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS IN DIETARY SELF-REPORT MAY COMPROMISE THE VALIDITY OF DIETARY-INTAKE MEASURES [J].
HEBERT, JR ;
CLEMOW, L ;
PBERT, L ;
OCKENE, IS ;
OCKENE, JK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (02) :389-398
[9]   Energy intake and meal portions: Associations with BMI percentile in US children [J].
Huang, TTK ;
Howarth, NYC ;
Lin, BH ;
Roberts, SB ;
McCrory, MA .
OBESITY RESEARCH, 2004, 12 (11) :1875-1885
[10]   Heart rate, heart rate variability, and heartbeat detection with the method of constant stimuli: slow and steady wins the race [J].
Knapp-Kline, K ;
Kline, JP .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 69 (03) :387-396