Characteristics of Stimulus Artifacts in EEG Recordings Induced by Electrical Stimulation of Cochlear Implants

被引:12
|
作者
Li, Xiaoxia [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Kaibao [2 ]
Karp, Floyd [2 ]
Tremblay, Kelly L. [2 ]
Rubinstein, Jay T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Prov Minist Joint Key Lab Electromagnet Field & E, Tianjin 300130, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Washington, Washington, WA USA
来源
2010 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (BMEI 2010), VOLS 1-7 | 2010年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
stimulus artifacts; Cortical auditory evoked potentials; cochlear implants; AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; BLIND SEPARATION; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; CHILDREN; PERCEPTION; FREQUENCY; RESPONSES; DYNAMICS; USERS; WIDTH;
D O I
10.1109/BMEI.2010.5639942
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are frequently used to detect the maturational status of the central auditory system in both healthy persons and cochlear implant listeners. However, with cochlear implant patients, the CAEP is partly or completely submerged in stimulus artifacts induced by current stimulation, making it difficult to faithfully detect auditory evoked potentials with cochlear implants. The aim of this study was to determine if a systematic relationship exists between the artifacts and cochlear implant fitting parameters using speech-like or tone stimuli. Chicken carcus was used as an experimental model to record stimulus artifacts at various implant settings, e. g. monopolar/bipolar stimulation, pulse width, and most comfortable level. The influence of the implant parameter variation on stimulus artifacts was systematically studied. The results of this study could potentially provide useful information for developing methods of eliminating stimulus artifacts in EEG recordings with cochlear implant patients.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 803
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Pathophysiology of Facial Nerve Stimulation and Its Implications for Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Dejong, Melissa D.
    Bertsch, Natasha J.
    Graham, Madison K.
    Goulson, Kayla R.
    Wernsman Pease, Megan L.
    Gruenwald, Jill M.
    Bross, Abigail E.
    Dornhoffer, James R.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Lane, John I.
    Pesch, Joerg
    Vanpoucke, Filiep J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (02) : e84 - e90
  • [2] A Comparison of Electrical Stimulation Levels Across Ears for Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Abdi, Roghayeh
    Dowell, Richard C.
    Nayagam, Bryony
    EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (05) : 1174 - 1186
  • [3] Stimulus Induced pH Changes in Cochlear Implants: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study
    Christie Q. Huang
    Paul M. Carter
    Robert K. Shepherd
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 29 : 791 - 802
  • [4] Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants
    Cushing, Sharon L.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    Gordon, Karen A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (10) : 1787 - 1791
  • [5] Stimulus induced pH changes in cochlear implants:: An in vitro and in vivo study
    Huang, CQ
    Carter, PM
    Shepherd, RK
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 29 (09) : 791 - 802
  • [6] Coding of Electrical Stimulation Patterns for Binaural Sound Coding Strategies for Cochlear Implants
    Hinrichs, Reemt
    Gajecki, Tom
    Ostermann, Jorn
    Nogueira, Waldo
    2019 41ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2019, : 4168 - 4172
  • [7] Optimal use of EEG recordings to target active brain areas with transcranial electrical stimulation
    Dmochowski, Jacek P.
    Koessler, Laurent
    Norcia, Anthony M.
    Bikson, Marom
    Parra, Lucas C.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 157 : 69 - 80
  • [8] Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Koka, Kanthaiah
    Litvak, Leonid M.
    Finley, Charles C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (01) : 124 - 130
  • [9] Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation
    Fredelake, Stefan
    Hohmann, Volker
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 287 (1-2) : 76 - 90
  • [10] Investigation of Electrical Stimulation Levels Over 8 to 10 Years Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using Cochlear Implants
    Gajadeera, Emalka A.
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Dowell, Richard C.
    Busby, Peter A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (06) : 736 - 745