Comparison of the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via a metered-dose inhaler with spacer, a dry-powder inhaler, and a jet nebulizer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

被引:13
作者
Ikeda, A [1 ]
Nishimura, K [1 ]
Koyama, H [1 ]
Tsukino, M [1 ]
Hajiro, T [1 ]
Mishima, M [1 ]
Izumi, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Resp Med, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease salbutamol; dry-powder inhaler; metered-dose inhaler; nebulizer;
D O I
10.1159/000029352
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via three different devices: a dry-powder inhaler (DPI), a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a large-volume spacer and a jet nebulizer (NEB) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ten male patients with stable COPD [age: 67.2 +/- 3.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): 1.56 +/- 0.32 liters] were studied in a randomized, double-blind and crossover manner. Each patient received 200 or 1,000 mu g salbutamol via an MDI with an InspirEase(TM) spacer, a Rotahaler(TM), or a DeVilbiss 646(TM) nebulizer (NEB), or matching placebo on 7 separate days. Spirometry was performed before and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 min after inhalation. With the 200-mu g dose, only DPI produced a small but greater response in maximum FEV1 and in area under the time-response curve (AUC-FEV1) compared with placebo. With the 1,000-mu g dose, DPI and MDI produced equally greater improvements in both maximum FEV1 and AUC-FEV1 than NEB. An equal bronchodilating effect can be obtained using either DPI or MDI with a spacer device, whereas the NEB was less effective when the same dose was administered.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ANANI A, 1989, EUR RESPIR J, V2, P640
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSE TO A BETA-ADRENERGIC DELIVERED FROM AN ULTRASONIC NEBULIZER [J].
BALLARD, RD ;
BOGIN, RM ;
PAK, J .
CHEST, 1991, 100 (02) :410-415
[4]  
BOGAARD JM, 1989, PHARMATHERAPEUTICA, V5, P400
[5]   COMPARISON OF INHALED ALBUTEROL POWDER AND AEROSOL IN ASTHMA [J].
BRONSKY, E ;
BUCHOLTZ, GA ;
BUSSE, WW ;
CHERVINSKY, P ;
CONDEMI, J ;
GHAFOURI, MA ;
HUDSON, L ;
LAKSHMINARAYAN, S ;
LOCKEY, R ;
REESE, ME ;
RENNARD, SI ;
SEGAL, A ;
SMOLLEY, L ;
SPECTOR, S ;
STABLEIN, JJ ;
VANAS, A ;
WILSON, A .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1987, 79 (05) :741-747
[6]   DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF INHALED SALBUTAMOL POWDER IN CHRONIC AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION [J].
CORRIS, PA ;
NEVILLE, E ;
NARIMAN, S ;
GIBSON, GJ .
THORAX, 1983, 38 (04) :292-296
[7]  
CROMPTON GK, 1982, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V63, P101
[8]   COMPARISON OF 3 TECHNIQUES OF INHALATION ON THE AIRWAY RESPONSE TO TERBUTALINE [J].
CUSHLEY, MJ ;
LEWIS, RA ;
TATTERSFIELD, AE .
THORAX, 1983, 38 (12) :908-913
[9]   TERBUTALINE IN COPD COMPARISON BETWEEN TURBUHALER(R) AND CHLOROFLUOROCARBON (CFC) INHALER [J].
FORMGREN, H ;
SJOKVIST, A ;
STAHL, E ;
WIREN, JE .
LUNG, 1994, 172 (05) :271-280
[10]   AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE TUBE SPACER IN PATIENTS UNABLE TO USE A CONVENTIONAL PRESSURIZED AEROSOL EFFICIENTLY [J].
GODDEN, DJ ;
CROMPTON, GK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF THE CHEST, 1981, 75 (02) :165-168