Prevalence of type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose: cross-sectional study of multiethnic adult population at the United States-Mexico border

被引:32
作者
Diaz-Apodaca, Beatriz A. [1 ]
Ebrahim, Shah [2 ]
McCormack, Valerie [3 ]
de Cosio, Federico G. [4 ]
Ruiz-Holguin, Rosalba [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Ciudad Juarez, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Res & Grad Studies, Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
[3] Int Agcy Res Canc, F-69372 Lyon, France
[4] Pan Amer Hlth Org, Chron Dis Program, Washington, DC USA
[5] US Mexico Border Off, WHO, Pan Amer Hlth Org, US Mexico Border Diabet Prevent & Control Project, El Paso, TX USA
来源
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH | 2010年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; type; 2; prevalence; border health; Mexico; United States; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; RISK-FACTORS; MELLITUS; OBESITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTS; AMERICANS; HEALTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1590/S1020-49892010000900007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. To estimate prevalence of type 2 diabetes (diabetes) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in the border region between the United States of America and Mexico, by ethnic origin and country of residence; identify risk factors associated with both conditions; and explore the extent to which these factors account for cross-border or ethnic disparities in prevalence. Methods. From April 2001 to November 2002, Phase I of the U.S.-Mexico Border Diabetes Prevention and Control Project, a prevalence study of diabetes and its risk factors, was conducted at the U.S.-Mexico border using multi-stage cluster sampling. A questionnaire was administered on diabetes (self-reported) and lifestyle and a physical examination and blood sample were obtained. A total of 4 027 adults participated in the study: 2 120 Hispanics from the Mexican side of the border and 1 437 Hispanics and 470 non-Hispanics (of whom 385 were classified as "white") from the U. S. side of the border. Results. The age-adjusted prevalence of self-reported and unrecognized diabetes in Hispanics was 15.4% (16.6% on the Mexican side of the border and 14.7% on the U. S. side). The age-adjusted prevalence of IFG was similar on both sides of the border (14.1% on the Mexican side and 13.6% on the U. S. side). Conclusions. Established risk factors for diabetes (e. g., age, obesity, and family history) were relevant and there was an inverse relationship between diabetes and education and socioeconomic level. While diabetes prevalence is high on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border, one-fourth of the cases remain undiagnosed, suggesting a need for development and implementation of a public health program for prevention, diagnosis, and control of diabetes in the region.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 181
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes in Mexico -: Results from a large population-based nationwide survey [J].
Aguilar-Salinas, CA ;
Monroy, OV ;
Gómez-Pérez, FJ ;
Chávez, AG ;
Esqueda, AL ;
Cuevas, VM ;
Rull-Rodrigo, JA ;
Conyer, RT .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (07) :2021-2026
[2]  
Ahmad OB, 2001, Age Standardization of Rates: A New WHO Standard. Ed GDP Series
[3]   Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipemias in Otomi indians [J].
Alvarado-Osuna, C ;
Milian-Suazo, F ;
Valles-Sánchez, V .
SALUD PUBLICA DE MEXICO, 2001, 43 (05) :459-463
[4]  
*AZ DEP HLTH SERV, 2005, AR VIT STAT DIFF HLT
[5]   Genetics of Type 2 diabetes [J].
Barroso, I .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (05) :517-535
[6]   The epidemiology of complications [J].
Bloomgarden, ZT .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (05) :924-932
[7]  
Burrows N. R., 2004, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V53, P941
[8]  
*CA DEP HLTH SERV, 2005, VIT STAT CAL 2003
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P702
[10]   RELATIONSHIP OF PREVALENCE OF NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS TO AMERINDIAN ADMIXTURE IN THE MEXICAN-AMERICANS OF SAN-ANTONIO, TEXAS [J].
CHAKRABORTY, R ;
FERRELL, RE ;
STERN, MP ;
HAFFNER, SM ;
HAZUDA, HP ;
ROSENTHAL, M .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 3 (06) :435-454