Analyzing Interoperability and Portability Concepts for Self-Sovereign Identity

被引:7
作者
Gruner, Andreas [1 ]
Muhle, Alexander [1 ]
Meinel, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Hasso Plattner Inst HPI, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
来源
2021 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRUST, SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (TRUSTCOM 2021) | 2021年
关键词
Blockchain; distributed ledger technology; digital identity; self-sovereign identity; trust; identity management; interoperability; portability;
D O I
10.1109/TrustCom53373.2021.00089
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) paradigm postulates global unique identities that are controlled by the user. To achieve a widespread applicability, the emphasized interoperability principle supports the proclaimed ambition. Furthermore, identity portability enables the transfer of the identity to another SSI solution. These axioms gain additional momentum due to the development of numerous implementations. In this paper, we examine interoperability and portability concepts for SSI. Initially, we define these principles regarding the blockchain-based SSI model. Subsequently, we outline assessment criteria considering functional scope, governance/ trust, scalability and further characteristics. For interoperability, we evaluate the concepts of protocol and standard, broker, hub and pairing. Besides that, we assess the transformer and auxiliary solutions for portability. We can conclude that all interoperability schemes provide the maximum functional level theoretically. In contrast, portability patterns are fragmented in this regard. Nonetheless, protocol and standards can only be applied in the design phase, whereas broker, hub, pairing, transformer and auxiliary solutions enable interoperability, respectively portability post-deployment of the SSI system.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 597
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Allen C., 2016, The path to self-sovereign identity
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, European Parliament Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament (General Data Protection Regulation)
[3]  
[Anonymous], INTERLEDGER PROTOCOL
[4]  
Backhouse J, 2009, The future of identity in the information society, P245
[5]  
Bertino E, 2011, ARTECH HSE INF SECUR, P1
[6]  
Borkowski Michael, 2018, Tech. Rep
[7]  
Cameron Kim., 2009, 7 LAWS IDENTITY
[8]  
Chadwick David W., 2013, 2013 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), P285, DOI 10.1109/ARES.2013.38
[9]  
Decentralized Identity Foundation, AUTH WORK GROUP DIDC
[10]  
EduROAM, ED