Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study

被引:34
作者
Napolitano, R. [1 ]
Donadono, V. [1 ]
Ohuma, E. O. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Knight, C. L. [1 ]
Wanyonyi, S. Z. [1 ]
Kemp, B. [1 ]
Norris, T. [1 ]
Papageorghiou, A. T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Green Templeton Coll, Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Hlth Inst, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Botnar Res Ctr, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
biparietal diameter; fetal head biometry; head circumference; occipitofrontal diameter; reproducibility; transthalamic and transventricular plane; ultrasound; variability; CROWN-RUMP LENGTH; INTERGROWTH-21ST PROJECT; BIPARIETAL DIAMETER; 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; STATISTICAL-METHODS; GROWTH; BIOMETRY; CHARTS; CIRCUMFERENCE;
D O I
10.1002/uog.15956
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the standard methods for ultrasound measurement of fetal head circumference (HC) and biparietal diameter (BPD) (outer-to-outer (BPDoo) vs outer-to-inner (BPDoi) caliper placement), and compare acquisition of these measurements in transthalamic (TT) vs transventricular (TV) planes. Methods This study utilized ultrasound images acquired from women participating in the Oxford arm of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. In the first phase of the study, BPDoo and BPDoi were measured on stored images. In the second phase, real-time measurements of BPD, occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) and HC in TT and TV planes were obtained by pairs of sonographers. Reproducibility of measurements made by the same (intraobserver) and by different (interobserver) sonographers, as well as the reproducibility of caliper placement and measurements obtained in different planes, was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Results In Phase I, we analyzed ultrasound images of 108 singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 2% (1.34 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 5% (3 mm) for both BPDoo and BPDoi. Neither method for measuring BPD showed consistently better reproducibility. In Phase II, we analyzed ultrasound images of 100 different singleton fetuses. The mean intraobserver and interobserver differences were < 1% (2.26 mm) and the 95% limits of agreement were < 8% (14.45 mm) for all fetal head measurements obtained in TV and TT planes. Neither plane for measuring fetal head showed consistently better reproducibility. Measurement of HC using the ellipse facility was as reproducible as HC calculated from BPD and OFD. OFD by itself was the least reproducible of all fetal head measurements. Conclusions Measurements of BPDoi and BPDoo are equally reproducible; however, we believe BPDoo should be used in clinical practice as it allows fetal HC to be measured and compared with neonatal HC. For all head measurements, TV and TT planes provide equally reproducible values at any gestational age, and HC values are similar in both planes. Fetal head measurement in the TT plane is preferable as international standards in this plane are available; however, measurements in the TV plane can be plotted on the same standards. Copyright (C) 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 85
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   FETAL BIPARIETAL DIAMETER IN SAUDI-ARABIA [J].
ALMESHARI, AA ;
RABER, H .
ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 1987, 7 (03) :227-233
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BJOG S2, DOI DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12127
[3]   GROWTH OF FETAL SKULL, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO WEIGHT FOR DATES OF NEWBORN CHILD [J].
BERGSJO, P ;
BAKKE, T ;
BJERKEDAL, T .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1976, 55 (01) :53-57
[4]   A NOTE ON THE USE OF THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT IN THE EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN 2 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (05) :337-340
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[7]   Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements [J].
Chan, L. W. ;
Fung, T. Y. ;
Leung, T. Y. ;
Sahota, D. S. ;
Lau, T. K. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (04) :447-452
[8]   FETAL HEAD AND ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCES .1. EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT ERRORS [J].
DETER, RL ;
HARRIST, RB ;
HADLOCK, FP ;
CARPENTER, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1982, 10 (08) :357-363
[9]   Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth [J].
Di Battista, E ;
Bertino, E ;
Benso, L ;
Fabris, C ;
Aicardi, G ;
Pagliano, M ;
Bossi, A ;
de Biasio, P ;
Milani, S .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 79 (03) :165-173
[10]   Prediction of fetal weight by ultrasound: the contribution of additional examiners [J].
Gull, I ;
Fait, G ;
Har-Toov, J ;
Kupfermic, MJ ;
Lessing, JB ;
Jaffa, AJ ;
Wolman, I .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :57-60