Estimation of soil moisture content under high maize canopy coverage from UAV multimodal data and machine learning

被引:112
作者
Cheng, Minghan [1 ,2 ]
Jiao, Xiyun [2 ]
Liu, Yadong [1 ]
Shao, Mingchao [1 ]
Yu, Xun [1 ]
Bai, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Zixu [1 ]
Wang, Siyu [1 ]
Tuohuti, Nuremanguli [1 ]
Liu, Shuaibing [1 ]
Shi, Lei [1 ]
Yin, Dameng [1 ]
Huang, Xiao [3 ]
Nie, Chenwei [1 ]
Jin, Xiuliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Crop Sci, Minist Agr, Key Lab Crop Physiol & Ecol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210048, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Wuxi South Ocean Coll, Wuxi 214081, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Remote sensing; Soil moisture; Multimodality; Data fusion; UAV-based; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; WATER-CONTENT; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGERY; VEGETATION INDEXES; GRAIN-YIELD; DATA FUSION; WHEAT; LEAF; REFLECTANCE; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107530
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
An accurate in-field estimate of soil moisture content (SMC) is critical for precision irrigation management. Current ground methods to measure SMC were limited by the disadvantages of small-scale monitoring and high cost. The development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms now provides a cost-effective means for measuring SMC on a large scale. However, previous studies have considered only single-sensor estimates of SMC, so the combination of multiple sensors has yet to be thoroughly discussed. Additionally, the way in which soil depth, canopy coverage, and crop cultivars affect the SMC-estimation accuracy remains unclear. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the SMC-estimation accuracy provided by multimodal data fusion and four machine learning algorithms: partial least squares regression, K nearest neighbor, random forest regression (RFR), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN); (2) discuss the accuracy of the remote-sensing approach for estimating SMC at different soil depths, and (3) explore how canopy coverage and crop cultivars affect the accuracy of SMC estimation. The following results were obtained: (1) Data from multispectral sensors provided the most accurate SMC estimates regardless of which of the four machine learning algorithms was used. (2) Multimodal data fusion improved the SMC estimation accuracy, especially when combining multispectral and thermal data. (3) The RFR algorithm provided more accurate SMC estimates than the other three algorithms, with the highest accuracy obtained by combining data from RGB, multispectral, and thermal sensors with an R-2 = 0.78 (0.78) and a relative root-mean-square error of 11.2% (9.6%) for 10-cm-deep (20-cm-deep) soil. (4) UAV-based SMC-estimation methods provided similar, stable performance for SMC estimates at various depths and even yielded smaller relative error for deeper estimates (20 cm). (5) The RFR and BPNN machine learning algorithms both provided relatively accurate SMC estimates for modest canopy coverage (0.2-0.4) but relatively poor estimates for higher (> 0.4) or lower (< 0.2) canopy coverage. (6) The SMC-estimation accuracy for different maize cultivars (JNK728 and ZD958) did not differ significantly (P < 0.01). These results indicate that UAVbased multimodal data fusion combined with machine learning algorithms can provide relatively accurate and repeatable SMC estimates. This approach can thus be used to monitor SMC and design precision irrigation systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   ON THE USE OF COMPACT L-BAND DICKE RADIOMETER (ARIEL) AND UAV FOR SOIL MOISTURE AND SALINITY MAP RETRIEVAL: 2008/2009 FIELD EXPERIMENTS [J].
Acevo-Herrera, R. ;
Aguasca, A. ;
Bosch-Lluis, X. ;
Camps, A. .
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, :3109-+
[2]   Design and First Results of an UAV-Borne L-Band Radiometer for Multiple Monitoring Purposes [J].
Acevo-Herrera, Rene ;
Aguasca, Albert ;
Bosch-Lluis, Xavier ;
Camps, Adriano ;
Martinez-Fernandez, Jose ;
Sanchez-Martin, Nilda ;
Perez-Gutierrez, Carlos .
REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 2 (07) :1662-1679
[3]   Non-invasive water content estimation in a tuff wall by DTS [J].
Agliata, Rosa ;
Bogaard, Thom A. ;
Greco, Roberto ;
Minardo, Aldo ;
Mollo, Luigi ;
Steele-Dunne, Susan C. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 197 :821-829
[4]   Temperature-Vegetation-soil Moisture Dryness Index (TVMDI) [J].
Amani, Meisam ;
Salehi, Bahram ;
Mahdavi, Sahel ;
Masjedi, Ali ;
Dehnavi, Sahar .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 197 :1-14
[5]   MARMIT: A multilayer radiative transfer model of soil reflectance to estimate surface soil moisture content in the solar domain (400-2500 nm) [J].
Bablet, A. ;
Vu, P. V. H. ;
Jacquemoud, S. ;
Viallefont-Robinet, F. ;
Fabre, S. ;
Briottet, X. ;
Sadeghi, M. ;
Whiting, M. L. ;
Baret, F. ;
Tian, J. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 217 :1-17
[6]  
Bai JJ, 2017, J INTEGR AGR, V16, P389, DOI [10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61302-8, 10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61302-8]
[7]   Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) [J].
Baluja, Javier ;
Diago, Maria P. ;
Balda, Pedro ;
Zorer, Roberto ;
Meggio, Franco ;
Morales, Fermin ;
Tardaguila, Javier .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2012, 30 (06) :511-522
[8]   A generalized regression-based model for forecasting winter wheat yields in Kansas and Ukraine using MODIS data [J].
Becker-Reshef, I. ;
Vermote, E. ;
Lindeman, M. ;
Justice, C. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (06) :1312-1323
[9]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[10]   Status of accuracy in remotely sensed and in-situ agricultural water productivity estimates: A review [J].
Blatchford, Megan L. ;
Mannaerts, Chris M. ;
Zeng, Yijian ;
Nouri, Hamideh ;
Karimi, Poolad .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 234