Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models and Scores in the Era of Personalized Medicine

被引:50
作者
Sofogianni, Areti [1 ]
Stalikas, Nikolaos [2 ]
Antza, Christina [3 ]
Tziomalos, Konstantinos [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hosp, Med Sch, Propedeut Dept Internal Med 1, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Cardiol, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Internal Med 3, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
关键词
cardiovascular risk; prediction; equation; SCORE; pooled cohort equations; personalized medicine; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; POOLED COHORT; FOLLOW-UP; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; FRAMINGHAM; VALIDATION; HEALTH; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jpm12071180
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Management of cardiovascular risk factors, particularly hypertension and dyslipidemia, has been shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, current guidelines recommend adjusting the intensity of blood pressure- and lipid-lowering treatment according to the cardiovascular risk of the patient. Therefore, cardiovascular risk prediction is a sine qua non for optimizing cardiovascular prevention strategies, particularly in patients without established CVD or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As a result, several cardiovascular risk prediction equations have been developed. Nevertheless, it is still unclear which is the optimal prediction risk equation. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding the accuracy of the most widely used cardiovascular risk prediction equations. Notably, most of these risk scores have not been validated in external cohorts or were shown to over- or underestimate risk in populations other than those in which they derive. Accordingly, country-specific risk scores, where available, should be preferred for cardiovascular risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   AN UPDATED CORONARY RISK PROFILE - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS [J].
ANDERSON, KM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
ODELL, PM ;
KANNEL, WB .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :356-362
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, British Medical Journal, V342, P1, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D548
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PUTT PREV 1 NHS HLTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], HOM ASS SCOR PRIOR P
[5]   Assessing risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: new data from the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study [J].
Assmann, G. ;
Schulte, H. ;
Cullen, P. ;
Seedorf, U. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2007, 37 (12) :925-932
[6]  
Assmann G, 1998, EUR HEART J, V19, pA2
[7]   Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study [J].
Assmann, G ;
Cullen, P ;
Schulte, H .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (03) :310-315
[8]   Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials [J].
Baigent, C. ;
Blackwell, L. ;
Emberson, J. ;
Holland, L. E. ;
Reith, C. ;
Bhala, N. ;
Peto, R. ;
Barnes, E. H. ;
Keech, A. ;
Simes, J. ;
Collins, R. .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9753) :1670-1681
[9]   Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study [J].
Brindle, P ;
Emberson, J ;
Lampe, F ;
Walker, M ;
Whincup, P ;
Fahey, T ;
Ebrahim, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7426) :1267-1270A
[10]   Performance of the Framingham and SCORE cardiovascular risk prediction functions in a non-diabetic population of a Spanish health care centre: a validation study [J].
Canon Barroso, Lourdes ;
Cruces Muro, Eloisa ;
Diaz Herrera, Natalio ;
Fernandez Ochoa, Gerardo ;
Calvo Hueros, Juan Ignacio ;
Buitrago, Francisco .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2010, 28 (04) :242-248