Evaluating the global impact of low-carbon energy transitions on social equity

被引:36
|
作者
Chapman, Andrew [1 ]
Shigetomi, Yosuke [2 ]
Ohno, Hajime [3 ]
McLellan, Benjamin [4 ]
Shinozaki, Akihiko [5 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Int Inst Carbon Neutral Energy Res I2CNER, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Fisheries & Environm Sci, Nagasaki, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Energy Sci, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Social equity; Energy transition; Renewable energy; Social burden; AIR-POLLUTION; FOSSIL-FUEL; JUSTICE; SOCIETY; SUSTAINABILITY; INEQUALITY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; TRILEMMA; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research examines the societal impacts of varying energy policy approaches and the progress of the energy transition toward a low carbon energy-based regime internationally. Using indicators relevant to energy policy and the energy transition, five critical social equity impacts of environmental improvement, health, employment, participation, and energy cost are investigated from the viewpoint of an 'equitable' energy transition. We investigate the correlation between quantitative social equity impacts and the shift toward new renewable energy-based electricity (i. e., wind, photovoltaic, geothermal, tidal, biomass etc.) from 1990 to 2015, for 99 nations with differing development levels, energy resources and policies. We find that increased levels of new renewable energy deployment generally accompany social equity improvement, however geography, national income level and complementary energy policies are also important. Our results highlight specific issues for developing nations, whereby electricity needs are often met by fossil fuels prior to the large-scale penetration of renewables. These nations enjoy short-term social equity benefits, at the risk of long-term negative social equity outcomes. This study's holistic evaluation of energy transitions and social equity outcomes could be used as an input to proactive policy development contributing to the realization of a more equitable energy transition.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 347
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating equity and justice in low-carbon energy transitions
    Kime, Sage
    Jacome, Veronica
    Pellow, David
    Deshmukh, Ranjit
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (12)
  • [2] Intersectionality and energy transitions: A review of gender, social equity and low-carbon energy
    Johnson, Oliver W.
    Han, Jenny Yi-Chen
    Knight, Anne-Louise
    Mortensen, Sofie
    Aung, May Thazin
    Boyland, Michael
    Resurreccion, Bernadette P.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 70
  • [3] Energy justice in a changing climate: social equity and low-carbon energy
    McCauley, Darren
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2014, 23 (04) : 706 - 708
  • [4] Energy Justice in a Changing Climate: Social Equity and Low-Carbon Energy
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 : 236 - 237
  • [5] Social Influence, Consumer Behavior, and Low-Carbon Energy Transitions
    Axsen, Jonn
    Kurani, Kenneth S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 37, 2012, 37 : 311 - 340
  • [6] Culture and low-carbon energy transitions
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Griffiths, Steve
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (09) : 685 - 693
  • [7] Culture and low-carbon energy transitions
    Benjamin K. Sovacool
    Steve Griffiths
    Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 : 685 - 693
  • [8] Modelling social influence and cultural variation in global low-carbon vehicle transitions
    Pettifor, H.
    Wilson, C.
    McCollum, D.
    Edelenbosch, O. Y.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 47 : 76 - 87
  • [9] Navigating systemic risks in low-carbon energy transitions in an era of global polycrisis
    Seshadri, Ashwin K.
    Gambhir, Ajay
    Debnath, Ramit
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 8
  • [10] Finance and justice in low-carbon energy transitions
    Hall, Stephen
    Roelich, Katy E.
    Davis, Mark E.
    Holstenkamp, Lars
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 : 772 - 780