Prediction of Success of External Cephalic Version after 36 Weeks

被引:53
作者
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
van der Steeg, Jan Willem [1 ]
van der Post, Joris A. M. [1 ]
Mol, Ben W. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
External cephalic version; prognosis; prediction model; breech; TERM;
D O I
10.1055/s-0030-1262909
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We aimed to develop a predictive model for the chance of a successful external cephalic version (ECV). We performed a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton fetus in breech presentation with a gestational age of 36 weeks or more. Data on parity, maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, gestational age, placental location, fetal position, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid were recorded in all participants. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise backward selection procedure was used to construct a prediction model for the occurrence of successful ECV. We included a total of 310 women. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that multiparity, increasing estimated fetal weight, and normal amniotic fluid were favorable predictors of successful ECV. Anterior placenta location was an unfavorable predictor for ECV outcome. Discrimination of the model was fair (area under the curve 0.71), and the calibration of the model was acceptable. Our prediction model appears to discriminate between women with a poor chance of successful ECV (less than 20%) and women with a good chance of success (more than 60%). When this model is validated externally, it could be used for patient counseling and clinical decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P235
[2]   External cephalic version: Predictors of success [J].
Aisenbrey, GA ;
Catanzarite, VA ;
Nelson, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (05) :783-786
[3]  
Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-X
[5]   THE INTRODUCTION OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AT TERM INTO ROUTINE CLINICAL-PRACTICE [J].
BEWLEY, S ;
ROBSON, SC ;
SMITH, M ;
GLOVER, A ;
SPENCER, JAD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 52 (02) :89-93
[6]  
Caukwell S, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol, V22, P486
[7]   External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks [J].
Collaris, RJ ;
Oei, SG .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) :511-518
[8]  
FORTUNATO SJ, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P59
[9]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[10]  
Hofmeyr GJ., 1996, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000083, 10.1002/14651858.CD000083]