Intraoperative Decrease in Amplitude of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials of the Lower Extremities With Interbody Fusion Cage Placement During Lumbar Fusion Surgery

被引:16
作者
Duncan, Jan William [2 ]
Bailey, Richard Anthony [1 ]
Baena, Rocio [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif Spine, Los Angeles, CA 90012 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Nu Wave Neurodiagnost Inc, Azusa, CA USA
关键词
somatosensory-evoked potential; electromyography; intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; SPINAL-CORD; SERIES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825e6ad6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A retrospective analysis was performed. Objective. To characterize neurophysiological data of patients who had a decrease in amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) of the lower extremities secondary to interbody fusion cage placement during lumbar fusion surgery with no alert of the electromyography (EMG). Summary of Background Data. The most consistently used and studied modalities of neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery are SSEPs, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and EMG. In general, it is accepted that MEPs along with SSEPs are used to detect spinal cord injury and EMGs are used to detect nerve root injury. Methods. The medical records of a consecutive series of 115 patients who had undergone a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure in which SSEPs, MEPs, and EMGs were utilized for neurophysiological monitoring were retrospectively reviewed. Results. One hundred fifteen cases of TLIF procedures were reviewed. The follow-up was 2 years after the last procedure. A total of 5 cases that demonstrated intraoperative SSEP changes were found. The age range for these cases was from 39 to 81 years (mean age, 61 yr). All 5 patients developed SSEP changes that were secondary to interbody fusion cage placement. All 5 cases demonstrated reversal of the SSEP changes to baseline after removal of the interbody cage. Three of these cases had no new postoperative neurological findings. However, given that these 3 cases of SSEP change were associated with a surgical event that improved secondary to an intervention (in this case removal of the interbody cage), those cases were classified as presumed positive. Two of the 5 cases were in fact associated with a new postoperative neurological deficit. Conclusion. To our knowledge this study demonstrates the first reported SSEP alerts that were associated with a posterior lumbar interbody cage placement without a corresponding EMG alert.
引用
收藏
页码:E1290 / E1295
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   CONTINUOUS INTRAOPERATIVE ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC RECORDING DURING SPINAL SURGERY [J].
BEATTY, RM ;
MCGUIRE, P ;
MORONEY, JM ;
HOLLADAY, FP .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 82 (03) :401-405
[2]   ANTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION COMPLICATED BY PARAPLEGIA - A CASE-REPORT OF A FALSE-NEGATIVE SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIAL [J].
BENDAVID, B ;
HALLER, G ;
TAYLOR, P .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (06) :536-539
[3]   Neurophysiologic monitoring of spinal nerve root function during instrumented posterior lumbar spine surgery [J].
Bose, B ;
Wierzbowski, LR ;
Sestokas, AK .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (13) :1444-1450
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF CORTICOSPINAL AND SOMATOSENSORY CONDUCTION SIMULTANEOUSLY DURING SCOLIOSIS SURGERY [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, R ;
STEPHEN, J ;
WOODFORTH, I ;
CRAWFORD, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (06) :388-396
[5]   INTRAOPERATIVE EVOKED EMG MONITORING IN AN ANIMAL-MODEL - A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR EVALUATING PEDICLE SCREW PLACEMENT [J].
CALANCIE, B ;
LEBWOHL, N ;
MADSEN, P ;
KLOSE, KJ .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (10) :1229-1235
[6]   Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: A review focus on the corticospinal tracts [J].
Deletis, Vedran ;
Sala, Francesco .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) :248-264
[7]   SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS DURING HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION FOR SCOLIOSIS [J].
ENGLER, GL ;
SPIELHOLZ, NI ;
BERNHARD, WN ;
DANZIGER, F ;
MERKIN, H ;
WOLFF, T .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1978, 60 (04) :528-532
[8]   The Evidence for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery Does It Make a Difference? [J].
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :S37-S46
[9]   Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review [J].
Gonzalez, Andres A. ;
Jeyanandarajan, Dhiraj ;
Hansen, Chris ;
Zada, Gabriel ;
Hsieh, Patrick C. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (04) :E6.1-E6.10
[10]   Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases [J].
Gunnarsson, T ;
Krassioukov, AV ;
Sarjeant, R ;
Fehlings, MG .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (06) :677-684