Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

被引:13
作者
Sohns, Christian [1 ]
Scherrer, Martin [2 ]
Staab, Wieland [2 ]
Obenauer, Silvia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Cardiol & Pneumol, Ctr Heart, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Radiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast tumours; Breast cancer; INTERPRETATION MODEL; ENHANCEMENT; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-011-2210-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess whether the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography (MRM) can distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. 207 MRM investigations were categorised according to BI-RADS. The results were compared to histology. All MRM studies were interpreted by two examiners. Statistical significance for the accuracy of MRM was calculated. A significant correlation between specific histology and MRM-tumour-morphology could not be reported. Mass (68%) was significant for malignancy. Significance raised with irregular shape (88%), spiculated margin (97%), rim enhancement (98%), fast initial increase (90%), post initial plateau (65%), and intermediate T2 result (82%). Highly significant for benignity was an oval mass (79%), slow initial increase (94%) and a hyperintense T2 result (77%), also an inconspicuous MRM result (77%) was often seen in benign histology. Symmetry (90%) and further post initial increase (90%) were significant, whereas a regional distribution (74%) was lowly significant for benignity. On basis of the BI-RADS classification an objective comparability and statement of diagnosis could be made highly significant. Due to the fact of false-negative and false-positive MRM-results, histology is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:2475 / 2483
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, 1998, AM COLL RAD BREAST I
  • [2] Aubard Y, 2002, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V23, P37
  • [3] False-Positive Findings at Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A BI-RADS Descriptor Study
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Benndorf, Matthias
    Dietzel, Matthias
    Gajda, Mieczyslaw
    Runnebaum, Ingo B.
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) : 1658 - 1663
  • [4] Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes
    Benndorf, Matthias
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Vag, Tibor
    Gajda, Mieczyslaw
    Runnebaum, Ingo B.
    Kaiser, Werner A.
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (07) : 715 - 721
  • [5] BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement
    Gutierrez, Robert L.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Eby, Peter R.
    Kurland, Brenda F.
    Peacock, Sue
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : 994 - 1000
  • [6] Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies
    Ikeda, DM
    Hylton, NM
    Kinkel, K
    Hochman, MG
    Kuhl, CK
    Kaiser, WA
    Weinreb, JC
    Smazal, SF
    Degani, H
    Viehweg, P
    Barclay, J
    Schnall, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (06) : 889 - 895
  • [7] Current status of breast MR imaging - Part 2. Clinical applications
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 672 - 691
  • [8] Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast
    Liberman, L
    Morris, EA
    Dershaw, DD
    Abramson, AF
    Tan, LK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (02) : 519 - 525
  • [9] Breast MB imaging: Interpretation model
    Nunes, LW
    Schnall, MD
    Orel, SG
    Hochman, MG
    Langlotz, CP
    Reynolds, CA
    Torosian, MH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) : 833 - 841
  • [10] Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model
    Nunes, LW
    Schnall, MD
    Orel, SG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) : 484 - 494