Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors

被引:13
作者
Sohns, Christian [1 ]
Scherrer, Martin [2 ]
Staab, Wieland [2 ]
Obenauer, Silvia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Cardiol & Pneumol, Ctr Heart, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Radiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast tumours; Breast cancer; INTERPRETATION MODEL; ENHANCEMENT; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-011-2210-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To assess whether the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography (MRM) can distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. 207 MRM investigations were categorised according to BI-RADS. The results were compared to histology. All MRM studies were interpreted by two examiners. Statistical significance for the accuracy of MRM was calculated. A significant correlation between specific histology and MRM-tumour-morphology could not be reported. Mass (68%) was significant for malignancy. Significance raised with irregular shape (88%), spiculated margin (97%), rim enhancement (98%), fast initial increase (90%), post initial plateau (65%), and intermediate T2 result (82%). Highly significant for benignity was an oval mass (79%), slow initial increase (94%) and a hyperintense T2 result (77%), also an inconspicuous MRM result (77%) was often seen in benign histology. Symmetry (90%) and further post initial increase (90%) were significant, whereas a regional distribution (74%) was lowly significant for benignity. On basis of the BI-RADS classification an objective comparability and statement of diagnosis could be made highly significant. Due to the fact of false-negative and false-positive MRM-results, histology is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:2475 / 2483
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
American College of Radiology, 1998, AM COLL RAD BREAST I
[2]  
Aubard Y, 2002, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V23, P37
[3]   False-Positive Findings at Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A BI-RADS Descriptor Study [J].
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Benndorf, Matthias ;
Dietzel, Matthias ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Runnebaum, Ingo B. ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (06) :1658-1663
[4]   Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes [J].
Benndorf, Matthias ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Vag, Tibor ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Runnebaum, Ingo B. ;
Kaiser, Werner A. .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (07) :715-721
[5]   BI-RADS Lesion Characteristics Predict Likelihood of Malignancy in Breast MRI for Masses But Not for Nonmasslike Enhancement [J].
Gutierrez, Robert L. ;
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Kurland, Brenda F. ;
Peacock, Sue ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) :994-1000
[6]   Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies [J].
Ikeda, DM ;
Hylton, NM ;
Kinkel, K ;
Hochman, MG ;
Kuhl, CK ;
Kaiser, WA ;
Weinreb, JC ;
Smazal, SF ;
Degani, H ;
Viehweg, P ;
Barclay, J ;
Schnall, MD .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (06) :889-895
[7]   Current status of breast MR imaging - Part 2. Clinical applications [J].
Kuhl, Christiane K. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) :672-691
[8]   Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast [J].
Liberman, L ;
Morris, EA ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Abramson, AF ;
Tan, LK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (02) :519-525
[9]   Breast MB imaging: Interpretation model [J].
Nunes, LW ;
Schnall, MD ;
Orel, SG ;
Hochman, MG ;
Langlotz, CP ;
Reynolds, CA ;
Torosian, MH .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) :833-841
[10]   Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model [J].
Nunes, LW ;
Schnall, MD ;
Orel, SG .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (02) :484-494