US Public Perceptions of an Intelligence Quotient Test Score Gap Between Black Americans and White Americans

被引:0
作者
Zigerell, L. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Dept Polit & Govt, Schroeder Hall 404, Normal, IL 61790 USA
关键词
intelligence quotient; IQ; intelligence; stereotypes; race; perceptions; inequality; RACIAL POLICY ATTITUDES; PARTISAN BIAS; IQ; ACCURACY; SCIENCE; RACE;
D O I
10.1177/1478929920917843
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Intelligence quotient (IQ) is a common measure of intelligence that associates with many important life outcomes. Research over several decades has indicated that the average IQ test score among Black Americans is lower than the average IQ test score among White Americans, but in weighted results from a national nonprobability survey, only about 41% of US adults indicated awareness of this IQ gap. Results from a follow-up convenience survey indicated that, in the aggregate, White participants' rating of White Americans' average IQ and average intelligence is higher than Blacks Americans' average IQ test score and average intelligence and was not driven by White participants' belief in a universal White intellectual superiority. These and other results could have implications regarding the US public's perceptions about the reasons for Black/White inequality and implications for the use of intelligence stereotype scales as measures of racial prejudice.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 606
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
*AM NAT EL STUD, 2016, ANES 2016 TIM SER ST
[2]  
American Bar Association, 2019, ABA PROF LEG PROF 20
[3]  
ANES,, 2014, US GUID COD ANES 201
[4]  
ANES (American National Election Studies), 2016, ANES 2012 TIM SER ST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Stata Statistical Software
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, BOT CAR UND WHATS BE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Victims and Offenders
[8]  
Artiga S., 2019, KEY FACTS HLTH HLTH
[9]  
Ashkenas Jeremy., 2017, The New York Times
[10]   Stereotype accuracy: Estimating the academic performance of ethnic groups [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Esses, VM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (02) :225-236