Unity and Multiplicity in Plato's diairetic method in the Sophist

被引:0
作者
de Oliveira Santos, Barbara Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
ARCHAI-REVISTA DE ESTUDOS SOBRE AS ORIGENS DO PENSAMENTO OCIDENTAL | 2021年 / 31卷
关键词
Plato; being; ontology; unity; dialectic; language;
D O I
10.14195/1984-249X_31_30
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
By placing diairesis in communion with the dialectic, Plato breaks with the dichotomous-univocal Parmenidean structure; in Fragment 2 of the poem On Nature by Parmenides, the goddess establishes that there are only two routes to the truth, one that is and one that is not. Of these two, Parmenides denies the second, stating that it is impossible to know what is not: for the pre-socratic philosopher to know something is related to what is, therefore, for him, it is impossible to know what is not. So, in Parmenides, there is a split between "being" and "not-being". Therefore, our objective in this article, is to explore the implications, for the diairesis in Plato's Sophist, of the Parmenidean affirmation that non-being is impossible to know.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, NONETRE DEUX ETUDES
[2]  
Aubenque P., 1991, Etudes sur le Sophiste de Platon
[3]  
Benardete Seth., 1984, The Being of the Beautiful: Plato's Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman, Translated with Commentary
[4]  
CAVALCANTE FILHO F. de A. V., 2013, THESIS U FEDERAL PAR
[5]  
CHERNISS H., 1933, ENIGME ANCIENNE ACAD
[6]  
Cordero N., 2016, Platon contra Platon. La autocritica del Parmenides y la ontologia del Sofista
[7]  
Cordero N.L., 1993, PLATON SOPHISTE
[8]  
Cornford F., 1935, PLATOS THEORY KNOWLE
[9]  
Crivelli Paolo., 2012, PLATOS ACCOUNT FALSE
[10]  
Curd Patricia., 1998, Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought