A review of the social impacts of neoliberal conservation: Formations, inequalities, contestations

被引:153
作者
Holmes, George [1 ]
Cavanagh, Connor J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, Sci Domain SD Environm Serv 5, Nairobi, Kenya
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragr, As, Norway
关键词
Neoliberalism; Conservation; Social impacts; Political ecology; Protected areas; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT; CARBON; COMMUNITY; POLICY; PARKS; ACCUMULATION; ECOTOURISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.014
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In recent years, perhaps the two most prominent debates in geography on issues of biodiversity conservation have hinged upon, firstly, the positive and negative social impacts of conservation projects on human populations, and, secondly, the apparent neoliberalisation of conservation. Yet so far there have been few explicit linkages drawn between these debates. This paper moves both debates forward by presenting the first review of how the neoliberalisation of conservation has affected the kinds of impacts that conservation projects entail for local communities. It finds that, whilst there are important variegations within neoliberal conservation, processes of neoliberalisation nevertheless tend to produce certain recurring trends in their social impacts. Firstly, neoliberal conservation often involves novel forms of power, particularly those that seek to re-shape local subjectivities in accordance with both conservationist and neoliberal-economic values. Secondly, it relies on greater use of use of representation and spectacle to produce commodities and access related markets, which can both create greater negative social impacts and offer new opportunities for local people to contest and reshape conservation projects. Thirdly, neoliberal conservation projects frequently widen the distribution of social impacts by interacting with pre-existing social, economic, and political inequalities. Accordingly, the paper illuminates how neoliberal approaches to conservation generate novel opportunities and constraints for struggles toward more socially and environmentally just forms of biodiversity preservation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 209
页数:11
相关论文
共 125 条
[51]   Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? [J].
Fairhead, James ;
Leach, Melissa ;
Scoones, Ian .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2012, 39 (02) :237-261
[52]   Neoliberal conservation and the potential for lawfare: New legal entities and the political ecology of litigation at Dwesa-Cwebe, South Africa [J].
Fay, Derick .
GEOFORUM, 2013, 44 :170-181
[53]   The Uses of Neoliberalism [J].
Ferguson, James .
ANTIPODE, 2010, 41 :166-184
[54]   Market mechanism or subsidy in disguise? Governing payment for environmental services in Costa Rica [J].
Fletcher, Robert ;
Breitling, Jan .
GEOFORUM, 2012, 43 (03) :402-411
[55]   Using the Master's Tools? Neoliberal Conservation and the Evasion of Inequality [J].
Fletcher, Robert .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2012, 43 (01) :295-317
[56]  
Fletcher Robert., 2010, Conservation and Society, V8, P171
[57]   Tourism and the politics of the global land grab in Tanzania: markets, appropriation and recognition [J].
Gardner, Benjamin .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2012, 39 (02) :377-402
[58]  
Grainger M., 2011, The New Forests Company and its Uganda plantations
[59]   Green grabbing and the dynamics of local-level engagement with neoliberalization in Tanzania's wildlife management areas [J].
Green, Kathryn E. ;
Adams, William M. .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2015, 42 (01) :97-117
[60]  
Heynen N., 2007, Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences