Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards

被引:54
作者
Battles, JB
Lilford, RJ
机构
[1] US Dept HHS, Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Univ Birmingham, UK Natl Hlth Serv, Res & Dev Directorate Methodol Programme, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2003年 / 12卷
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient safety has become an international priority with major research programmes being carried out in the USA, UK, and elsewhere. The challenge is how to organize research efforts that will produce the greatest yield in making health care safer for patients. Patient safety research initiatives can be considered in three different stages: (1) identification of the risks and hazards; (2) design, implementation, and evaluation of patient safety practices; and (3) maintaining vigilance to ensure that a safe environment continues and patient safety cultures remain in place. Clearly, different research methods and approaches are needed at each of the different stages of the continuum. A number of research approaches can be used at stage 1 to identify risks and hazards including the use of medical records and administrative record review, event reporting, direct observation, process mapping, focus groups, probabilistic risk assessment, and safety culture assessment. No single method can be universally applied to identify risks and hazards in patient safety. Rather, multiple approaches using combinations of these methods should be used to increase identification of risks and hazards of health care associated injury or harm to patients.
引用
收藏
页码:II2 / II7
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Bari R, 1998, PROBABILISTIC SAFETY
  • [2] A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs
    Battles, JB
    Shea, CE
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [3] INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I
    BRENNAN, TA
    LEAPE, LL
    LAIRD, NM
    HEBERT, L
    LOCALIO, AR
    LAWTHERS, AG
    NEWHOUSE, JP
    WEILER, PC
    HIATT, HH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [4] Using antecedents of medical care to develop valid quality of care measures
    Coyle, YM
    Battles, JB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [5] THE INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM DOES NOT DETECT ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - A PROBLEM FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
    CULLEN, DJ
    BATES, DW
    SMALL, SD
    COOPER, JB
    NEMESKAL, AR
    LEAPE, LL
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1995, 21 (10): : 541 - 548
  • [6] Donabedian A., 1980, EXPLORATIONS QUALITY, VI
  • [7] Donaldson L., 2005, An organisation with a memory: Report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS
  • [8] EISENBERG JM, 2001, MED ERRORS EPIDEMIC
  • [9] FREITAG M, 1997, EVENT ACCIDENT ORG L, P11
  • [10] On error management: lessons from aviation
    Helmreich, RL
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) : 781 - 785