Allocative Efficiency of Carbon Emission Allowances among Sectors in China

被引:9
作者
Chen, Lili [1 ,2 ]
He, Feng [2 ]
Wang, Jianjian [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Donlinks Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2018年 / 27卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon emissions; DEA; ZSG-DEA; distribution; industries; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; REGIONAL ALLOCATION; REALLOCATION; INTENSITY; OECD;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/75821
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With rapid economic development, energy consumption and environmental pollution have become increasingly prominent, making clear emission reduction targets necessary. Therefore, this paper forecasts input and output variables for China's six industries during the 13th Five-Year Plan by using an EBM-DEA model to analyze the distribution efficiency of the industries. Moreover, the ZSG-DEA model is used to optimize carbon emission quotas and establish a reasonable distribution plan. The results show that among the six major sectors in China, the initial allocation of carbon emission rights has relatively low DEA efficiency, with significant efficiency differences among sectors. Only agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries achieved an efficient initial allocation of carbon emission rights, whereas industry and transportation, warehousing, and the postal service exhibited low allocative efficiency. The industrial sector has the greatest room for adjustment and its reduction can be compensated for through an increase in emissions from the other sectors so as to keep total carbon emissions constant. Based on the conclusions of the study, we make suggestions for various stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 563
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models [J].
Gomes, E. G. ;
Lins, M. P. E. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (05) :616-623
[12]  
Kaya Y., 1997, Environment, energy, and economy: strategies for sustainability (4)
[13]   Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA [J].
Lozano, S. ;
Villa, G. ;
Braennlund, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (03) :752-760
[14]   What is driving the EU burden-sharing agreement: Efficiency or equity? [J].
Marklund, Per-Olov ;
Samakovlis, Eva .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (02) :317-329
[15]   Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China: a zero sum gains data envelopment model [J].
Miao, Zhuang ;
Geng, Yong ;
Sheng, Jichuan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :4144-4150
[16]   The evolution of the "carbonization index" in developing countries [J].
Mielnik, O ;
Goldemberg, J .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (05) :307-308
[17]   Pareto improvement through a reallocation of carbon emission quotas [J].
Pang, Rui-zhi ;
Deng, Zhong-qi ;
Chiu, Yung-ho .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :419-430
[18]   Allocation of emission permits using DEA: centralised and individual points of view [J].
Sun, Jiasen ;
Wu, Jie ;
Liang, Liang ;
Zhong, Ray Y. ;
Huang, George Q. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (02) :419-435
[19]   The decrease of CO2 emission intensity is decarbonization at national and global levels [J].
Sun, JW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (08) :975-978
[20]   Optimal Path for Controlling Sectoral CO2 Emissions Among China's Regions: A Centralized DEA Approach [J].
Sun, Zuoren ;
Luo, Rundong ;
Zhou, Dequn .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01)