Allocative Efficiency of Carbon Emission Allowances among Sectors in China

被引:9
作者
Chen, Lili [1 ,2 ]
He, Feng [2 ]
Wang, Jianjian [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Donlinks Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2018年 / 27卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon emissions; DEA; ZSG-DEA; distribution; industries; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; REGIONAL ALLOCATION; REALLOCATION; INTENSITY; OECD;
D O I
10.15244/pjoes/75821
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With rapid economic development, energy consumption and environmental pollution have become increasingly prominent, making clear emission reduction targets necessary. Therefore, this paper forecasts input and output variables for China's six industries during the 13th Five-Year Plan by using an EBM-DEA model to analyze the distribution efficiency of the industries. Moreover, the ZSG-DEA model is used to optimize carbon emission quotas and establish a reasonable distribution plan. The results show that among the six major sectors in China, the initial allocation of carbon emission rights has relatively low DEA efficiency, with significant efficiency differences among sectors. Only agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries achieved an efficient initial allocation of carbon emission rights, whereas industry and transportation, warehousing, and the postal service exhibited low allocative efficiency. The industrial sector has the greatest room for adjustment and its reduction can be compensated for through an increase in emissions from the other sectors so as to keep total carbon emissions constant. Based on the conclusions of the study, we make suggestions for various stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 563
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (15) :943-946
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CHIN STAT YB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHIN STAT YB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CHIN STAT YB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, China Statistical Yearbook
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, China Statistical Yearbook
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, China Statistical Yearbook
[8]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[9]   An Efficiency Evaluation of the EU's Allocation of Carbon Emission Allowances [J].
Chiu, Y. -H. ;
Lin, J. -C. ;
Su, W. -N. ;
Liu, J. -K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2015, 10 (02) :192-200
[10]   Technological change and timing reductions in greenhouse gas emissions [J].
Faere, Rolf ;
Grosskopf, Shawna ;
Margaritis, Dimitri ;
Weber, William L. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2012, 37 (03) :205-216