How Should Philosophers Approach the History of Philosophy

被引:0
作者
Goldberg, Nathaniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington & Lee Univ, Philosophy Dept, Lexington, VA 24450 USA
关键词
anthropology of philosophy; antiquarianism; approaches to the history of philosophy; collegialism; doxology; historical reconstruction; rational reconstruction;
D O I
10.1163/18722636-12341475
中图分类号
K [历史、地理];
学科分类号
06 ;
摘要
Philosophers' attitudes toward the history of philosophy are mixed. Regardless, likely all philosophers interact with the history of philosophy through research, teaching, or professional life. How should they approach it? I answer by analyzing the notion of `history of philosophy'. I then consider prominent recent answers given by others converging with mine. I conclude that (as long as they are clear on their approach) philosophers should be guided by preference and project to approach the history of philosophy by emphasizing history, philosophy, something intermediate, or both.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 158
页数:20
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Allais Lucy., 2015, Manifest Reality Kant's Idealism and His Realism
[2]  
Allison HenryE., 2004, KANTS TRANSCENDENTAL, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT1CC2KJC
[3]  
Ameriks Karl., 2006, KANT HIST TURN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, RIV STORIADELLA FILO, V2, P27
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, KANTS DIALECTIC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, KANTS ANAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD HDB HIST ANAL, P30
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DESCARTES EMBODIED R
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LEIBNIZ BODY SUBSTAN