Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis

被引:1
作者
Moberg, AC
Ahlberg, G
Leijonmarck, CE
Montgomery, A [1 ]
Reiertsen, O
Rosseland, AR
Stoerksson, R
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] St Goran Hosp, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Akershus Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Norbyhagen, Norway
关键词
appendicectomy; diagnostic reliability; complications; normal appendix;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, the number of complications associated with the laparoscopic technique, and the effect of leaving a macroscopically normal-looking appendix in place. Design: Three prospective protocols. Setting: Three departments of surgery, one in Norway and two in Sweden. Subjects: 1043 patients aged 15 years or over. Interventions: Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis who were to be operated on. Main outcome measures: Morbidity, mortality, and histological appearance of removed appendices, and outcome whether or not the patient was operated on. Results: 819 patients had appendicectomies (61% laparoscopically and 39% by convertion to open operation) with a total complication rate of 10%. In 211 patients a diagnostic laparoscopy was done as a single procedure. There were 181 women in this group and 86 of them had gynaecological disorders. The complication rate was 2% among these 211 patients and after a follow up of two years no patients had been readmitted for appendicectomy. 13 patients were subjected to other open procedures. The overall mortality was 0.4%. Conclusion:: Diagnostic laparoscopy is safe and can be recommended in patients with suspected acute appendicitis, particularly in women. a macroscopically normal-looking appendix can be left in place.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 840
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   APPENDECTOMY AND THE RISK OF TUBAL INFERTILITY [J].
MUELLER, BA ;
DALING, JR ;
MOORE, DE ;
WEISS, NS ;
SPADONI, LR ;
STADEL, BV ;
SOULES, MR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (24) :1506-1508
[22]   LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY [J].
PIER, A ;
GOTZ, F ;
BACHER, C ;
IBALD, R .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 17 (01) :29-33
[23]  
REIERTSEN O, 1985, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V151, P521
[24]   PROSPECTIVE NONRANDOMIZED STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY [J].
REIERTSEN, O ;
TRONDSEN, E ;
BAKKA, A ;
ANDERSEN, OK ;
LARSEN, S ;
ROSSELAND, AR .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 18 (03) :411-416
[25]  
Reiertsen O, 1997, BRIT J SURG, V84, P482
[26]   Laparoscopic appendectomy: Comparison with open appendectomy in 720 patients [J].
Richards, KF ;
Fisher, KS ;
Flores, JH ;
Christensen, BJ .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 6 (03) :205-209
[27]  
RICHARDS W, 1993, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V177, P473
[28]  
Sosa J L, 1993, J Laparoendosc Surg, V3, P129, DOI 10.1089/lps.1993.3.129
[29]   ADHESIVE SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - A REVIEW OF 321 CASES IN A THAI HOSPITAL [J].
TANPHIPHAT, C ;
CHITTMITTRAPAP, S ;
PRASOPSUNTI, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 154 (03) :283-287
[30]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY - PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
TATE, JJT ;
DAWSON, JW ;
CHUNG, SCS ;
LAU, WY ;
LI, AKC .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8872) :633-637