Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management

被引:236
作者
Moynihan, DA [1 ]
Pandey, SK
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jopart/mui016
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Public administration finds itself in an era of government by performance management, which is reflected in the widespread assumption that management is a key determinant of performance, and that it is reasonable to expect managers to measurably improve organizational effectiveness. This article joins a growing literature in seeking to conceptualize and empirically test how external environmental influences and internal management factors combine to create performance, relying on data from the 2002-2003 National Administrative Studies Project (NASP-II) survey of state government health and human services officials. We categorize managerial efforts to facilitate organizational performance as determined either through their interactions with the organizational environment, or through employing workable levers to change internal organizational culture, structure, and technology. Among the external environmental variables we find that the support of elected officials and the influence of the public and media have a positive impact on effectiveness. Among internal management choices, the ability to create a developmental organizational culture, establish a focus on results through goal clarity, and decentralize decision-making authority are all positively associated with organizational effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 439
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   ORGANIZATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCE AND INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE [J].
AIKEN, M ;
HAGE, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1968, 33 (06) :912-930
[2]  
American Public Human Services Association (APHSA), 2001, PUBL HUM SERV DIR 20
[3]  
ANDREWS R, 2003, NAT PUBL MAN RES C G
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Journal of Applied Psychology, DOI [DOI 10.1037/H0077946, 10.1037/h0077946]
[5]  
[Anonymous], BUREAUCRATIC GOVERNM
[6]  
Barzelay M., 2001, NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMEN
[7]  
Boston J., 1991, RESHAPING STATE NZ B, P1
[8]   Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda [J].
Boyne, GA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2003, 13 (03) :367-394
[9]  
BOZEMAN B, 1987, ALL ORG PUBLIC
[10]  
Brewer GeneA., 2000, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V10, P685, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024287