The interplay between renewable portfolio standards and voluntary green power markets in the United States

被引:12
作者
Zhou, Shan [1 ]
Solomon, Barry D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Social Sci, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49331 USA
关键词
Green power; Green pricing; Hybrid random effects regression; Policy stringency; Renewable portfolio standard; Voluntary environmental programs; RANDOM-EFFECTS MODELS; PUBLIC-GOODS; DEMAND; DEPLOYMENT; PROVISION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Utility voluntary green power programs that allow energy consumers to pay a premium for electricity generated from renewable energy sources have gained great momentum worldwide in recent years. While there is growing literature examining customer behaviors related to green power purchases, limited work has been done to systematically evaluate the efficacy of voluntary green power programs implemented in conjunction with government-led renewable energy policies. In this research, we construct an innovative panel dataset for 49 U.S. states and Washington, D.C. from 2001 to 2013, with the goal to understand factors influencing total sales and customers of voluntary green power programs. Hybrid random effects regression models are estimated to investigate the impact of state renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) on the performance of voluntary green power markets. We find that for a given state, an increase in RPS policy stringency by one unit would lead to a reduction of green power program customer enrollment by 12.37%, and a reduction in green power program sales by 12.98%. Our results suggest that the competing effect is dominant between the voluntary green power market and the renewable energy regulatory regime: state RPSs tend to crowd out cheap renewable-sourced electricity that is available for sale through utility green power programs. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality
    Alberini, A
    Segerson, K
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 22 (1-2) : 157 - 184
  • [2] Allison P.D., 2009, Fixed effect regression models
  • [3] Renewable Portfolio Standards and Policy Stringency: An Assessment of Implementation and Outcomes
    Anguelov, Nikolay
    Dooley, William F.
    [J]. REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [4] BEA U.S Department of Commerce., GDP STAT
  • [5] Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data
    Bell, Andrew
    Jones, Kelvyn
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2015, 3 (01) : 133 - 153
  • [6] Market and welfare effects of renewable portfolio standards in United States electricity markets
    Bhattacharya, Suparna
    Giannakas, Konstantinos
    Schoengold, Karina
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 384 - 401
  • [7] Bird Lori., 2008, ELECT J, V21, P18, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2007.12.006
  • [8] Brown A., 2016, NRELTP6A2064503
  • [9] Carley S., 2019, COMMUNICATION
  • [10] Empirical evaluation of the stringency and design of renewable portfolio standards
    Carley, Sanya
    Davies, Lincoln L.
    Spence, David B.
    Zirogiannis, Nikolaos
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (09): : 754 - 763