Estimation of the Standardized Risk Difference and Ratio in a Competing Risks Framework: Application to Injection Drug Use and Progression to AIDS After Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy

被引:55
作者
Cole, Stephen R. [1 ]
Lau, Bryan [2 ]
Eron, Joseph J. [3 ]
Brookhart, M. Alan [1 ]
Kitahata, Mari M. [4 ]
Martin, Jeffrey N. [5 ]
Mathews, William C. [6 ]
Mugavero, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
AIDS; cohort study; competing risks; HIV; survival function; CAUSAL; CONFOUNDER; EXPOSURE; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwu122
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There are few published examples of absolute risk estimated from epidemiologic data subject to censoring and competing risks with adjustment for multiple confounders. We present an example estimating the effect of injection drug use on 6-year risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) after initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy between 1998 and 2012 in an 8-site US cohort study with death before AIDS as a competing risk. We estimate the risk standardized to the total study sample by combining inverse probability weights with the cumulative incidence function; estimates of precision are obtained by bootstrap. In 7,182 patients (83% male, 33% African American, median age of 38 years), we observed 6-year standardized AIDS risks of 16.75% among 1,143 injection drug users and 12.08% among 6,039 nonusers, yielding a standardized risk difference of 4.68 (95% confidence interval: 1.27, 8.08) and a standardized risk ratio of 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.72). Results may be sensitive to the assumptions of exposure-version irrelevance, no measurement bias, and no unmeasured confounding. These limitations suggest that results be replicated with refined measurements of injection drug use. Nevertheless, estimating the standardized risk difference and ratio is straightforward, and injection drug use appears to increase the risk of AIDS.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   CONFOUNDING - ESSENCE AND DETECTION [J].
MIETTINEN, OS ;
COOK, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1981, 114 (04) :593-603
[22]   Differences in HIV disease progression by injecting drug use in HIV-infected persons in care [J].
Moore, RD ;
Keruly, JC ;
Chaisson, RE .
JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2004, 35 (01) :46-51
[23]   ANALYSIS OF FAILURE TIMES IN PRESENCE OF COMPETING RISKS [J].
PRENTICE, RL ;
KALBFLEISCH, JD ;
PETERSON, AV ;
FLOURNOY, N ;
FAREWELL, VT ;
BRESLOW, NE .
BIOMETRICS, 1978, 34 (04) :541-554
[24]   The relationship between injection, and noninjection drug use and HIV disease progression [J].
Qian, Han-Zhu ;
Stinnette, Samuel E. ;
Rebeiro, Peter F. ;
Kipp, Aaron M. ;
Shepherd, Bryan E. ;
Samenow, Charles P. ;
Jenkins, Cathy A. ;
No, Paul ;
McGowan, Catherine C. ;
Hulgan, Todd ;
Sterling, Timothy R. .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2011, 41 (01) :14-20
[25]   THE FOUNDATIONS OF CONFOUNDING IN EPIDEMIOLOGY [J].
ROBINS, JM ;
MORGENSTERN, H .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1987, 14 (9-12) :869-916
[26]  
Robins JM, 2000, J AM STAT ASSOC, V95, P431, DOI 10.2307/2669381
[27]  
Rothman KJ, 2008, MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY
[28]  
SAS Institute, 2013, EST PLOTT CUM INC FU
[29]   Approaches to Uncertainty in Exposure Assessment in Environmental Epidemiology [J].
Spiegelman, Donna .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 31, 2010, 31 :149-163
[30]   Estimating Absolute Risks in the Presence of Nonadherence An Application to a Follow-up Study With Baseline Randomization [J].
Toh, Sengwee ;
Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia ;
Logan, Roger ;
Robins, James M. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (04) :528-539