Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia and Related Morbidity and Mortality Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

被引:103
作者
Henderson, Jillian T. [1 ]
Vesco, Kimberly K. [1 ]
Senger, Caitlyn A. [1 ]
Thomas, Rachel G. [1 ]
Redmond, Nadia [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Kaiser Permanente Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Portland, OR USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2021年 / 326卷 / 12期
关键词
LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN; PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UTERINE ARTERY DOPPLER; HIGH-RISK; UNITED-STATES; PUBLICATION BIAS; WOMEN; FETAL; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2021.8551
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that poses serious maternal and infant health risks. Previous systematic reviews have established benefits of low-dose aspirin taken during pregnancy to prevent preeclampsia and its sequelae. Objective To update evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) on effectiveness of aspirin use in preventing preeclampsia in individuals at increased risk based on clinical risk factors or measurements associated with higher disease incidence than in the general population. Data Sources Studies from previous USPSTF review (2014), literature published January 2013 through May 15, 2020, in MEDLINE, PubMed (for publisher-supplied records only), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Ongoing surveillance through January 22, 2021. Study Selection Good- and fair-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy to prevent preeclampsia among individuals at increased risk; studies conducted in general populations to evaluate potential harms. Data Extraction and Synthesis Dual article screening and risk-of-bias assessment. Study data abstracted into prespecified forms, checked for accuracy. Random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Diagnosis of preeclampsia; adverse pregnancy health outcomes and complications including eclampsia, perinatal mortality, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and potential bleeding harms or infant/child harms from aspirin exposure. Results A total of 23 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (N = 26 952) were included; 18 were conducted among participants at increased preeclampsia risk. Aspirin dosages ranged from 50 mg/d to 150 mg/d. Most trials enrolled majority White populations selected based on a range of risk factors. The incidence of preeclampsia among the trials of participants at increased risk ranged from 4% to 30%. Aspirin use was significantly associated with lower risk of preeclampsia (pooled relative risk [RR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.75-0.95]; 16 RCTs [n = 14 093]; I-2 = 0%), perinatal mortality (pooled RR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.96]; 11 RCTs [n = 13 860]; I-2 = 0%), preterm birth (pooled RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; 13 RCTs [n = 13 619]; I-2 = 49%), and intrauterine growth restriction (pooled RR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68-0.99]; 16 RCTs [n = 14 385]; I-2 = 41%). There were no significant associations of aspirin use with risk of postpartum hemorrhage (pooled RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.94-1.12]; 9 RCTs [n = 23 133]; I-2 = 0%) and other bleeding-related harms, or with rare perinatal or longer-term harms. Absolute risk reductions for preeclampsia associated with aspirin use ranged from -1% to -6% across larger trials (n >300) and were greater in smaller trials. For perinatal mortality, absolute risk reductions ranged from 0.5% to 1.1% in the 3 largest trials. Conclusions and Relevance Daily low-dose aspirin during pregnancy was associated with lower risks of serious perinatal outcomes for individuals at increased risk for preeclampsia, without evident harms. This systematic review to support the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement on aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia and related morbidity and mortality summarizes published evidence on the benefits and harms of aspirin use in individuals at increased preeclampsia risk based on clinical risk factors or measurements associated with higher disease incidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1206
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Poon, Leona
    Wright, David
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2013, 33 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [2] The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review
    Al-Rubaie, Z. T. A.
    Askie, L. M.
    Ray, J. G.
    Hudson, H. M.
    Lord, S. J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (09) : 1441 - 1452
  • [3] External validation of preexisting first trimester preeclampsia prediction models
    Allen, Rebecca E.
    Zamora, Javier
    Arroyo-Manzano, David
    Velauthar, Luxmilar
    Allotey, John
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Aquilina, Joseph
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 217 : 119 - 125
  • [4] Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Vintzileos, Anthony M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : 1557 - 1563
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Obstet Gynecol, V135, P1492, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003892]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, Human Development Report
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, Final recommendation statement: Healthful diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: Behavioral counseling
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, PREGN MORT SURV SYST
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1995, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology, V102, P861, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1995.TB10872.X, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10872.x]
  • [10] Associations Between Migraine and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Aukes, Annet M.
    Yurtsever, Feyza N.
    Boutin, Amelie
    Visser, Marieke C.
    de Groot, Christianne J. M.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2019, 74 (12) : 738 - 748