A Regularized GLS for Structural Equation Modeling

被引:23
|
作者
Arruda, Erin H. [1 ]
Bentler, Peter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
condition number; model fit; regularization; shrinkage; weight matrix; TEST STATISTICS; SAMPLE-SIZE; COVARIANCE; CONVERGENCE; ESTIMATORS; TESTS; RIDGE;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2017.1318392
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Ill conditioning of covariance and weight matrices used in structural equation modeling (SEM) is a possible source of inadequate performance of SEM statistics in nonasymptotic samples. A maximum a posteriori (MAP) covariance matrix is proposed for weight matrix regularization in normal theory generalized least squares (GLS) estimation. Maximum likelihood (ML), GLS, and regularized GLS test statistics (RGLS and rGLS) are studied by simulation in a 15-variable, 3-factor model with 15 levels of sample size varying from 60 to 100,000. A key result showed that in terms of nominal rejection rates, RGLS outperformed ML at all sample sizes below 500, and GLS at most sample sizes below 500. In larger samples, their performance was equivalent. The second regularization methodology (rGLS) performed well asymptotically, but poorly in small samples. Regularization in SEM deserves further study.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 665
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliable and More Powerful Methods for Power Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Zhao, Yanyun
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 24 (03) : 315 - 330
  • [32] Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review
    Fan Y.
    Chen J.
    Shirkey G.
    John R.
    Wu S.R.
    Park H.
    Shao C.
    Ecological Processes, 5 (1)
  • [33] A Note on Structural Equation Modeling Estimates of Reliability
    Yang, Yanyun
    Green, Samuel B.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2010, 17 (01) : 66 - 81
  • [34] Fungible Parameter Estimates in Structural Equation Modeling
    Lee, Taehun
    MacCallum, Robert C.
    Browne, Michael W.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 23 (01) : 58 - 75
  • [35] lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
    Rosseel, Yves
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2012, 48 (02): : 1 - 36
  • [36] Can ridge and Elastic net structural equation modeling be used to stabilize parameter estimates when latent factors are correlated?
    Scharf, Florian
    Pfortner, Jana
    Nestler, Steffen
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (06) : 928 - 940
  • [37] Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Tian, Yubin
    Yanagihara, Hirokazu
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2015, 80 (02) : 379 - 405
  • [38] Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling With Nonnormal Missing Data
    Tong, Xin
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (04) : 553 - 565
  • [39] Improving the convergence rate and speed of Fisher-scoring algorithm: ridge and anti-ridge methods in structural equation modeling
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Bentler, Peter M.
    ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 2017, 69 (03) : 571 - 597
  • [40] Integrative Classification Using Structural Equation Modeling of Homeostasis
    Fang, Hong-Bin
    Huang, Hengzhen
    Yuan, Ao
    Fan, Ruzong
    Tan, Ming T.
    STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES, 2024, 16 (03) : 742 - 760