A Regularized GLS for Structural Equation Modeling

被引:23
|
作者
Arruda, Erin H. [1 ]
Bentler, Peter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
condition number; model fit; regularization; shrinkage; weight matrix; TEST STATISTICS; SAMPLE-SIZE; COVARIANCE; CONVERGENCE; ESTIMATORS; TESTS; RIDGE;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2017.1318392
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Ill conditioning of covariance and weight matrices used in structural equation modeling (SEM) is a possible source of inadequate performance of SEM statistics in nonasymptotic samples. A maximum a posteriori (MAP) covariance matrix is proposed for weight matrix regularization in normal theory generalized least squares (GLS) estimation. Maximum likelihood (ML), GLS, and regularized GLS test statistics (RGLS and rGLS) are studied by simulation in a 15-variable, 3-factor model with 15 levels of sample size varying from 60 to 100,000. A key result showed that in terms of nominal rejection rates, RGLS outperformed ML at all sample sizes below 500, and GLS at most sample sizes below 500. In larger samples, their performance was equivalent. The second regularization methodology (rGLS) performed well asymptotically, but poorly in small samples. Regularization in SEM deserves further study.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 665
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regularized Structural Equation Modeling
    Jacobucci, Ross
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    McArdle, John J.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (04) : 555 - 566
  • [2] Regularized Structural Equation Modeling With Stability Selection
    Li, Xiaobei
    Jacobucci, Ross
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 27 (04) : 497 - 518
  • [3] Revisiting the Model Size Effect in Structural Equation Modeling
    Shi, Dexin
    Lee, Taehun
    Terry, Robert A.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (01) : 21 - 40
  • [4] Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments
    Deng, Lifang
    Yang, Miao
    Marcoulides, Katerina M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [5] Assessing Model Similarity in Structural Equation Modeling
    Lai, Keke
    Green, Samuel B.
    Levy, Roy
    Reichenberg, Ray E.
    Xu, Yuning
    Thompson, Marilyn S.
    Yel, Nedim
    Eggum-Wilkens, Natalie D.
    Kunze, Katie L.
    Iida, Masumi
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (04) : 491 - 506
  • [6] Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Regularization in Structural Equation Modeling
    Jacobucci, Ross
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (04) : 639 - 649
  • [7] Robust Structural Equation Modeling with Missing Data and Auxiliary Variables
    Yuan, Ke-Hai
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2012, 77 (04) : 803 - 826
  • [8] A Critique of the Structural Equation Modeling Technique
    Makina, Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES (ECRM2016), 2016, : 415 - 422
  • [9] Parameter Influence in Structural Equation Modeling
    Lee, Taehun
    MacCallum, Robert C.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (01) : 102 - 114
  • [10] Convex formulation for regularized estimation of structural equation models
    Pruttiakaravanich, Anupon
    Songsiri, Jitkomut
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2020, 166 (166)