Extending public transit accessibility models to recognise transfer location

被引:8
|
作者
Chia, Jason [1 ]
Lee, Jinwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sci & Engn Fac, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Fac Built Environm, Sch Architecture & Design, City Planning, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Accessibility; Transit; Spatial; Transfer; Smart card; GIS; CONNECTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; GIS; INDICATORS; QUALITY; WALKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102618
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A longstanding issue for public transit agencies has been how to assess the performance of transit service including spatial service coverage to meet the transport needs of the community. The conventional approach quantifies accessibility using door-to-door travel time in such a way that accessibility declines as the travel time to the opportunity increases. A new approach to modelling transit accessibility is proposed by incorporating the potential effect of transfer location. It builds on the premise that transit users may have a preference for a transfer location best located relative to the trip origin and destination points. The model is tested in Brisbane's bus network which has a radial form, where inner-city suburbs have relatively higher accessibility than outer-city suburbs, if only travel time is counted. Incorporating the transfer location refines the accessibility modelling so that some outer-city suburbs located along the major bus corridors have a relatively higher accessibility level. The new model also suggests that inner-city suburbs do not necessarily have better accessibility. Suburbs close to the city centre may have shorter transit travel time to reach other suburbs, but they do not have a well-connected transit network to other suburbs through service transfers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Public Transit Accessibility for Blind Riders: A Train Station Navigation Assistant
    Guentert, Markus
    ASSETS 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2011, : 317 - 318
  • [22] Measuring the impacts of dockless micro-mobility services on public transit accessibility
    Liu, Luyu
    Miller, Harvey J.
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2022, 98
  • [23] High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility
    Tribby, Calvin P.
    Zandbergen, Paul A.
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 34 : 345 - 355
  • [24] Comparison of the transportation network for public transit and private vehicles in Shanghai: An accessibility approach
    Fan, Naifu
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Tian, Tiantian
    Zhao, Siyu
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [25] Integration of e-scooter sharing with public transit on employment accessibility and equity
    Hu, Liyang
    Liao, Yuan
    Gao, Kun
    Jin, Sheng
    Precup, Radu-Emil
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 140
  • [26] A utility-based travel impedance measure for public transit network accessibility
    Nassir, Neema
    Hickman, Mark
    Malekzadeh, Ali
    Irannezhad, Elnaz
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 88 : 26 - 39
  • [27] Stop location design in public transportation networks: covering and accessibility objectives
    Gross, Dwi Retnani Poetranto
    Hamacher, HorstW.
    Horn, Simone
    Schoebel, Anita
    TOP, 2009, 17 (02) : 335 - 346
  • [28] Stop location design in public transportation networks: covering and accessibility objectives
    Dwi Retnani Poetranto Groß
    Horst W. Hamacher
    Simone Horn
    Anita Schöbel
    TOP, 2009, 17 : 335 - 346
  • [29] Disparities in public transit accessibility and usage by people with mobility disabilities: An evaluation using high-resolution transit data
    Liu, Luyu
    Kar, Armita
    Tokey, Ahmad Ilderim
    Le, Huyen T. K.
    Miller, Harvey J.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 109
  • [30] Spatial accessibility measures to educational facilities from public transit: a case of Indian cities
    Yenisetty, Pavan Teja
    Bahadure, Pankaj
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 10 (02) : 258 - 273