Semi-Separable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Inference in Bayesian Hierarchical Models

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Yichuan [1 ]
Sutton, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Informat, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 27 (NIPS 2014) | 2014年 / 27卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sampling from hierarchical Bayesian models is often difficult for MCMC methods, because of the strong correlations between the model parameters and the hyperparameters. Recent Riemannian manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (RMHMC) methods have significant potential advantages in this setting, but are computationally expensive. We introduce a new RMHMC method, which we call semi-separable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, which uses a specially designed mass matrix that allows the joint Hamiltonian over model parameters and hyperparameters to decompose into two simpler Hamiltonians. This structure is exploited by a new integrator which we call the alternating blockwise leapfrog algorithm. The resulting method can mix faster than simpler Gibbs sampling while being simpler and more efficient than previous instances of RMHMC.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Springer Texts in Statistics
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Advances in neural information processing systems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Statistical Science, DOI [10.1214/ss/1177011137, DOI 10.1214/SS/1177011137]
[6]  
Bache K., 2013, UCI Machine Learning Repository
[7]  
Betancourt M. J., 2012, ARXIV E PRINTS
[8]  
Betancourt M. J., 2013, ARXIV E PRINTS
[9]   Scaling limits for the transient phase of local Metropolis-Hastings algorithms [J].
Christensen, OF ;
Roberts, GO ;
Rosenthal, JS .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2005, 67 :253-268
[10]   Riemann manifold Langevin and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods [J].
Girolami, Mark ;
Calderhead, Ben .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2011, 73 :123-214