Energy Conservation or Emission Reduction? The Effects of Different Types of Environmental Regulations on Enterprises' Green Innovation Preference

被引:0
作者
Li, Zibiao [1 ]
Wang, Siwei [1 ]
Sun, Keyuan [1 ]
Li, Han [1 ]
Lu, Xue [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
green innovation; pollution charges; environmental subsidies; energy conservation; emission reduction; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; CHINA; POLICY; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; MATTER; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1177/21582440221106733
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Previous research on green innovation sought to comprehend the antecedents and outcomes of environmental regulations. However, how these antecedents translate into outcomes may vary depending on different types of environmental regulations, such as environmental subsidies and pollution charges. We propose and test the effects of different environmental regulations on enterprises' green innovation preferences. Moreover, we analyze how ownership type moderates the observed effects. The fundamental results reveal that: (1) Environmental subsidies and pollution charges positively affect energy conservation innovation. (2) Environmental subsidies and pollution charges positively affect emission reduction innovation. (3) Pollution charges are not as effective as environmental subsidies in promoting energy conservation innovation. However, pollution charges have a greater implementation effect than environmental subsidies in encouraging emission reduction innovation. (4) The types of enterprise ownership only play a positive moderating role in the relationship between pollution charges and emission reduction innovation. Accordingly, this paper provides auxiliary decision-making for the government to motivate the energy conservation and emission reduction of enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities
    Albort-Morant, Gema
    Leal-Millan, Antonio
    Cepeda-Carrion, Gabriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (11) : 4912 - 4917
  • [2] Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms
    Albrizio, Silvia
    Kozluk, Tomasz
    Zipperer, Vera
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 : 209 - 226
  • [3] A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms
    Andersen, Jim
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2021, 104 (104)
  • [4] Green efficiency and environmental subsidy: Evidence from thermal power firms in China
    Bai, Yu
    Hua, Congcong
    Jiao, Jianling
    Yang, Min
    Li, Fangyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 49 - 61
  • [5] Local environmental regulation and plant-level productivity
    Becker, Randy A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (12) : 2516 - 2522
  • [6] Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs
    Bellucci, Andrea
    Pennacchio, Luca
    Zazzaro, Alberto
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2019, 52 (01) : 213 - 240
  • [7] Green electricity investments: Environmental target and the optimal subsidy
    Bigerna, Simona
    Wen, Xingang
    Hagspiel, Verena
    Kort, Peter M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 279 (02) : 635 - 644
  • [8] Voluntary environmental regulation in developing countries: Mexico's Clean Industry Program
    Blackman, Allen
    Lahiri, Bidisha
    Pizer, William
    Rivera Planter, Marisol
    Munoz Pina, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 60 (03) : 182 - 192
  • [9] REGULATION AS A MEANS FOR THE SOCIAL-CONTROL OF TECHNOLOGY
    BRAUN, E
    WIELD, D
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 1994, 6 (03) : 259 - 272
  • [10] Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China
    Bu, Maoliang
    Qiao, Zhenzi
    Liu, Beibei
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 : 10 - 18