How do information flows affect impact from environmental research?-An analysis of a science-policy network

被引:4
|
作者
Ferre, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Ortega, Julia [1 ]
Di Gregorio, Monica [1 ]
Dallimer, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] French Agr Res Ctr Int Dev Cirad, UMR Innovat, F-34398 Montpellier, France
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Research impact; Science -policy network; Boundary organisations; Information flows; Catchment management; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; SOCIAL NETWORK; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH; PRODUCTIVE INTERACTIONS; BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; RESOURCE GOVERNANCE; SOCIETAL IMPACT; COLLABORATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115828
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evidence of the impact arising from environmental research is increasingly demanded. Exchanges between science providers and actors that use scientific knowledge to address environmental problems are recognized as a key component of the mechanisms through which impact occurs. Yet, the role of interactions between science and policy actors in delivering and shaping research impact is not well established. We aim to better understand how transfer of science in a science-policy network generates impact. Our approach relies on an exploratory social network analysis (SNA), applied to a network of organisations working on land and water management in a catchment in the UK. We analyse flows of scientific information across these organisations and how those contribute to impact, which we conceptualized as change in organisations at three levels: increased awareness, operational change and strategic change. We find that organisations occupying central positions in the network facilitate the transfer of science and influence the level of change achieved. We also find that the effectiveness of the flows of information and impact delivery depends on boundary organisations, in particular public regulatory bodies, that connect agents with others. Moreover, intended change reported by science providers does not often transform directly into change as reported by the receivers of the information. We conclude that both exchanges between researchers and research users and the role of boundary organisations are key to impact delivery and making change possible. This is valuable for understanding where improvements to information flows between organisations might enhance impact.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Understand how machine learning impact lung cancer research from 2010 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis
    Chen, Zijian
    Liu, Yangqi
    Lin, Zeying
    Huang, Weizhe
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [32] How do knowledge diversity and ego-network structures affect firms' sustainable innovation: evidence from alliance innovation networks of China's new energy industries
    Zhao, Yan
    Qi, Niannian
    Li, Luying
    Li, Zheng
    Han, Xiao
    Xuan, Ling
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (01) : 178 - 196
  • [33] How do patients and physicians perceive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as a disease? Results from Indian analysis of ITP World Impact Survey (I-WISh)
    Chakrabarti, Prantar
    George, Biju
    Shanmukhaiah, Chandrakala
    Sharma, Lalit Mohan
    Udupi, Shashank
    Ghanima, Waleed
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [34] What does high value care for musculoskeletal conditions mean and how do you apply it in practice? A consensus statement from a research network of physiotherapists in New South Wales, Australia
    Gleadhill, Connor
    Dooley, Katherine
    Kamper, Steven J.
    Manvell, Nicole
    Corrigan, Michael
    Cashin, Aidan
    Birchill, Noah
    Donald, Bruce
    Leyland, Murray
    Delbridge, Andrew
    Barnett, Chris
    Renfrew, David
    Lamond, Steven
    Boettcher, Craig Edward
    Chambers, Lucia
    Maude, Travis
    Davis, Jon
    Hodgson, Stephanie
    Makaroff, Andrew
    Wallace, James B.
    Kotrick, Kelly
    Mullen, Nicholas
    Gallagher, Ryan
    Zelinski, Samuel
    Watson, Toby
    Davidson, Simon
    Da Silva, Priscilla Viana
    Mahon, Benjamin
    Delore, Caitlin
    Manvell, Joshua
    Gibbs, Benedicta
    Hook, Chris
    Stoddard, Chris
    Meers, Elliot
    Byrne, Michael
    Schneider, Tim
    Bolsewicz, Katarzyna
    Williams, Christopher Michael
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):