The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone

被引:70
作者
Bayraktar, HH
Gupta, A
Kwon, RY
Papadopoulos, P
Keaveny, TM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Computat Solid Mech Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2004年 / 126卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.1763177
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Despite the importance of multiaxial failure of trabecular bone in many biomechanical applications, to date no complete multiaxial failure criterion for human trabecular bone has been developed. By using expertimentally validated nonlinear high-resolution, micromechanical finite-element models as a surrogate for multiaxial loading experiments, we determined the three-dimensional normal strain Yield surface and all combinations of the two-dimensional normal-shear strain yield envelope. High-resolution finite-element models of three human femoral neck trabecular bone specimens obtained through micro-computed tomography were used. In total, 889 multiaxial-loading cases were analyzed, requiring over 41,000 CPU hours on parallel supercomputers. Our results indicated that the multiaxial yield behavior of trabecular bone in strain space was homogeneous across the specimens and nearly isotropic. Analysis of stress-strain curves along each axis in the 3-D normal strain space indicated uncoupled yield behavior; whereas substantial coupling was seen for normal-shear loading. A modified super-ellipsoid surface with only parameters fit the normal strain yield data very well with an arithmetic error+/-SD less than -0.04+/--5.1%. Furthermore, the Principal strains associated with normal-shear loading showed excellent agreement with the yield surface obtained for normal strain loading (arithmetic error+/-SD <2.5+/-6.5%). We conclude that the four-parameter "Modified Super-Ellipsoid" yield surface presented here describes the multiaxial failure behavior of human femoral neck trabecular bone very well.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 684
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Evaluation of three unstructured multigrid methods on 3D finite element problems in solid mechanics
    Adams, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 55 (05) : 519 - 534
  • [2] Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
    Bayraktar, HH
    Morgan, EF
    Niebur, GL
    Morris, GE
    Wong, EK
    Keaveny, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 37 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [3] BAYRAKTAR HH, 2004, IN PRESS J BIOMECH
  • [4] Three-dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the computer numerically controlled milling technique
    Beck, JD
    Canfield, BL
    Haddock, SM
    Chen, TJH
    Kothari, M
    Keaveny, TM
    [J]. BONE, 1997, 21 (03) : 281 - 287
  • [5] BURR AH, 1981, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V1, P11
  • [6] Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric
    Chang, WCW
    Christensen, TM
    Pinilla, TP
    Keaveny, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1999, 17 (04) : 582 - 585
  • [7] STRESS-ANALYSIS OF A CONDYLAR KNEE TIBIAL COMPONENT - INFLUENCE OF METAPHYSEAL SHELL PROPERTIES AND CEMENT INJECTION DEPTH
    CHEAL, EJ
    HAYES, WC
    LEE, CH
    SNYDER, BD
    MILLER, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1985, 3 (04) : 424 - 434
  • [8] Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA
    Cody, DD
    Gross, GJ
    Hou, FJ
    Spencer, HJ
    Goldstein, SA
    Fyhrie, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (10) : 1013 - 1020
  • [9] FABRIC DEPENDENCE OF AN ANISOTROPIC STRENGTH CRITERION
    COWIN, SC
    [J]. MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 1986, 5 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [10] A cellular solid criterion for predicting the axial-shear failure properties of bovine trabecular bone
    Fenech, CM
    Keaveny, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (04): : 414 - 422