Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: general or domain-specific?

被引:41
|
作者
Neuenhaus, Nora [1 ]
Artelt, Cordula [1 ]
Lingel, Klaus [2 ]
Schneider, Wolfgang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bamberg, Dept Educ Res, D-96045 Bamberg, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychol, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Metacognition; Metacognitive knowledge; Cross-curricular competencies; Academic achievement; STRATEGIES; CHILDREN; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1007/s10212-010-0040-7
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the structure of metacognitive knowledge in fifth grade pupils and its relation to school achievement. Since the structure of metacognitive knowledge is controversially discussed with little empirical evidence for either its domain specificity or its domain transferability, the debate remains somewhat hypothetical up to date. In theory it is assumed that the development of metacognitive knowledge begins highly domain and situation-specific and becomes more flexible and domain-transcending with practice and experience (Borkowski et al. 2000). As standardized measures to assess metacognitive knowledge of students in the age group under investigation were missing, newly developed instruments were applied to assess the domain-specific metacognitive knowledge in reading and mathematics as well as domain-transcending metacognitive knowledge. The influences of domain-specific and general metacognitive knowledge on school achievement in the two domains were analyzed. While findings on the structure of metacognitive knowledge indicate some degree of domain specificity, they also point out a strong relation between general metacognitive knowledge and domain-specific metacognitive knowledge. The cross-sectional relation between metacognitive knowledge and academic achievement were relatively low. Implications for future research will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 178
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: general or domain-specific?
    Nora Neuenhaus
    Cordula Artelt
    Klaus Lingel
    Wolfgang Schneider
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2011, 26 : 163 - 178
  • [2] Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments
    Fitzgerald, Lisa M.
    Arvaneh, Mahnaz
    Dockree, Paul M.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2017, 49 : 264 - 277
  • [3] Domain-specific metacognitive calibration in children with learning disabilities
    Crane, N.
    Zusho, A.
    Ding, Y.
    Cancelli, A.
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 50 : 72 - 79
  • [4] Domain-specific updating of metacognitive self-beliefs
    Hoogervorst, Kelly
    Banellis, Leah
    Allen, Micah G.
    COGNITION, 2025, 254
  • [5] Metacognition across domains: Is the association between arithmetic and metacognitive monitoring domain-specific?
    Bellon, Elien
    Fias, Wim
    De Smedt, Bert
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [6] Domain-Specific Enhancement of Metacognitive Ability Following Meditation Training
    Baird, Benjamin
    Mrazek, Michael D.
    Phillips, Dawa T.
    Schooler, Jonathan W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (05) : 1972 - 1979
  • [7] Domain-specific knowledge and domain-general abilities in children's science problem-solving
    Schaefer, Jonas
    Reuter, Timo
    Karbach, Julia
    Leuchter, Miriam
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 94 (02) : 346 - 366
  • [8] From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection
    Geurten, Marie
    Meulemans, Thierry
    Lemaire, Patrick
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 48 : 62 - 81
  • [9] Domain-specific and domain-general metacognition for strategy selection in children with learning disabilities
    Geurten, Marie
    Lemaire, Patrick
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (17) : 14297 - 14305
  • [10] Development and reciprocal effects of metacognitive and domain specific knowledge components in secondary school
    Artelt, Cordula
    Neuenhaus, Nora
    Lingel, Klaus
    Schneider, Wolfgang
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 2012, 63 (01) : 18 - 25