共 50 条
Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation
被引:12
|作者:
Pithara, Christalla
[1
,2
]
Farr, Michelle
[1
,2
]
Sullivan, Sarah A.
[1
,2
,3
]
Edwards, Hannah B.
[1
,2
]
Hall, William
[4
]
Gadd, Caroline
[5
]
Walker, Julian
[4
]
Hebden, Nick
[5
]
Horwood, Jeremy
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, 9th Floor Whitefriars, Bristol BS1 2NT, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res Appl Res Collaborat West, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Ctr Acad Mental Hlth, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Avon & Wiltshire Mental Hlth Partnership NHS Trus, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Otsuka Hlth Solut, Slough, Berks, England
关键词:
health care technology;
mental health;
community health care;
patient-centered care;
patient care planning;
implementation science;
USER;
PEOPLE;
COPRODUCTION;
PERSPECTIVES;
ONLINE;
D O I:
10.2196/14868
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Mental health services aim to provide recovery-focused care and facilitate coproduced care planning In practice, mental health providers can find supporting individualized coproduced care with service users difficult while balancing administrative and performance demands. To help meet this aim and using principles of coproduction, an innovative mobile digital care pathway tool (CPT) was developed to be used on a tablet computer and piloted in the West of England. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine mental health care providers' views of and experiences with the CPT during the pilot implementation phase and identify factors influencing its implementation. Methods: A total of 20 in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with providers participating in the pilot and managers in the host organization. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and thematically analyzed guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: The tool was thought to facilitate coproduced recovery-focused care planning, a policy and organizational as well as professional priority. Internet connectivity issues, system interoperability, and access to service users' health records affected use of the tool during mobile working. The organization's resources, such as information technology (IT) infrastructure and staff time and IT culture, influenced implementation. Participants' levels of use of the tool were dependent on knowledge of the tool and self-efficacy; perceived service-user needs and characteristics; and perceptions of impact on the therapeutic relationship. Training and preparation time influenced participants' confidence in using the tool. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of congruence between staff, organization, and external policy priorities and digital technologies in aiding intervention engagement, and the need for ongoing training and support of those intended to use the technology during and after the end of implementation interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文