The influence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) on reproductive performance in pig production farms in Styria (Austria)

被引:0
作者
Peinhart, E. M. [1 ]
Exel, B. [2 ]
Djuras, G. [3 ]
Dieber, F. [4 ]
Sipos, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Klin Schweine Vet Med, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] SchweineBeratung Steiermark, Gleisdorf, Austria
[3] Zentrum Wirtschafts & Innovat Forsch Stat Anwendu, Graz, Austria
[4] Bezirkshauptmannschaft Weiz, Weiz, Austria
来源
WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT | 2011年 / 98卷 / 1-2期
关键词
PRRS; reproductive performance; seroprevalence; vaccination; SYNDROME VIRUS; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; LELYSTAD VIRUS; VACCINATION; INFECTION; DISEASE; TRANSMISSION; ETIOLOGY; FAILURE; HERDS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The influence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PARS) on reproductive performance in pig production farms in Styria (Austria) Introduction The porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PARS) is one of the most important diseases of swine. The economic impact caused by PARS is estimated to be 560 Mio. US Dollars per year in the United States. However, the results are not comparable to the situation in Austria because of the different sizes and structures of herds. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present PARS prevalence and the influence of a chronic infection on the reproductive performance of Styrian pig breeding farms. Additionally, the effects of management features on reproductive performance were analysed. Material and methods Altogether, 130 suitable farms were chosen randomly and assigned to one of the following groups: group A = PRRSV-antibody (Ab)-negative, group B = PRRSV-Ab-positive, and group C = PRRS-MLV-vaccinated. To increase comparability, 65 of these farms were separated due to specific criteria (groups A(1), B(1) and C(1)). Results and conclusion Between groups A(1) and B(1) no significant differences concerning reproductive performance could be found, but there was a trend towards higher preweaning mortality in group B(1). Less piglets were born alive in the vaccinated group when compared to group A(1) and also more returns to estrus were evident. Furthermore, management had a significant impact on reproductive performance. In conclusion, the influence of a chronic PRRSV infection on reproductive performance seems to be minor under the Styrian conditions. However, the negative effect of vaccination should be discussed critically and vaccination schedules should be adapted to local conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
BEDDIES M, 2001, BERNB BIOT WORKSH BE, P79
[2]  
Benfield D., 2000, Veterinary Research (Paris), V31, P71, DOI 10.1051/vetres:2000007
[3]  
Benfield D.A., 1997, Proc. Am. Assoc. Swine Practitioners, P455
[4]  
Bierk MD, 2001, CAN J VET RES, V65, P261
[5]   Appearance of acute PRRS-like symptoms in sow herds after vaccination with a modified live PRRS vaccine [J].
Botner, A ;
Strandbygaard, B ;
Sorensen, KJ ;
Have, P ;
Madsen, KG ;
Madsen, ES ;
Alexandersen, S .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1997, 141 (19) :497-499
[6]  
Cavanagh D, 1997, ARCH VIROL, V142, P629
[7]   PERSISTENCE OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS IN SERUM AND SEMEN OF ADULT BOARS [J].
CHRISTOPHERHENNINGS, J ;
NELSON, EA ;
HINES, RJ ;
NELSON, JK ;
SWENSON, SL ;
ZIMMERMAN, JJ ;
CHASE, CCL ;
YAEGER, MJ ;
BENFIELD, DA .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 1995, 7 (04) :456-464
[8]  
DASTIG B, 2003, THESIS U WLEN
[9]  
Elicker S, 2009, WIEN TIERARZTL MONAT, V96, P246
[10]  
Elicker S, 2009, TIERAERZTL UMSCHAU, V64, P484