Rapid Antigen Tests for Influenza: Rationale and Significance of the FDA Reclassification

被引:53
作者
Green, Daniel A. [1 ]
St George, Kirsten [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, Lab Viral Dis, Albany, NY USA
[3] SUNY Albany, Dept Biomed Sci, Albany, NY USA
关键词
influenza; rapid tests; diagnostics; public health; DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; UNITED-STATES; B VIRUSES; A H1N1; PLUS B; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM; FLU;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00711-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid antigen tests for influenza, here referred to as rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), have been widely used for the diagnosis of influenza since their introduction in the 1990s due to their ease of use, rapid results, and suitability for point of care (POC) testing. However, issues related to the diagnostic sensitivity of these assays have been known for decades, and these issues gained greater attention following reports of their poor performance during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. In turn, significant concerns arose about the consequences of false-negative results, which could pose significant risks to both individual patient care and to public health efforts. In response to these concerns, the FDA convened an advisory panel in June 2013 to discuss options to improve the regulation of the performance of RIDTs. A proposed order was published on 22 May 2014, and the final order published on 12 January 2017, reclassifying RIDTs from class I to class II medical devices, with additional requirements to comply with four new special controls. This reclassification is a landmark achievement in the regulation of diagnostic devices for infectious diseases and has important consequences for the future of diagnostic influenza testing with commercial tests, warranting the prompt attention of clinical laboratories, health care systems, and health care providers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue test for detection of influenza A and B viruses in the pediatric emergency medicine setting by use of three specimen collection methods [J].
Agoritsas, Konstantinos ;
Mack, Kathy ;
Bonsu, Bema K. ;
Goodman, Debbie ;
Salamon, Douglas ;
Marcon, Mario J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (07) :2638-2641
[2]  
Baas C, 2013, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V18, P19
[3]   A meta-analysis of point-of-care laboratory tests in the diagnosis of novel 2009 swine-lineage pandemic influenza A (H1N1) [J].
Babin, Steven M. ;
Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang ;
Rothman, Richard E. ;
Gaydos, Charlotte A. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2011, 69 (04) :410-418
[4]  
Balish A., 2009, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V58, P826
[5]   Analytical detection of influenza A(H3N2)v and other A variant viruses from the USA by rapid influenza diagnostic tests [J].
Balish, Amanda ;
Garten, Rebecca ;
Klimov, Alexander ;
Villanueva, Julie .
INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2013, 7 (04) :491-496
[6]  
Beck Eric, 2012, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V61, P873
[7]   Direct Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses in Less Than 20 Minutes Using a Commercially Available Rapid PCR Assay [J].
Binnicker, Matthew J. ;
Espy, Mark J. ;
Irish, Cole L. ;
Vetter, Emily A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (07) :2353-2354
[8]   National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events [J].
Budnitz, Daniel S. ;
Pollock, Daniel A. ;
Weidenbach, Kelly N. ;
Mendelsohn, Aaron B. ;
Schroeder, Thomas J. ;
Annest, Joseph L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (15) :1858-1866
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, RAP DIAGN TEST INFL
[10]   Accuracy of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests A Meta-analysis [J].
Chartrand, Caroline ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Minion, Jessica ;
Brewer, Timothy ;
Pai, Madhukar .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 156 (07) :500-U80